Hey all!
Ok so I've been very closely interested in a Dr Chettawut vaginoplasty for a long long time now, however I am just considering my options, as especially as a very young, working age person, I don't want to be stuck in a bed for tooo long (if i can help it!), so I have thought of a vaginoplasty without a vaginal cavity. I know other surgeons (such as Dr Brassard) offer this as a separate surgery.
Being only sexually involved with people without penises, for a number of reasons, my main concerns are function (lubrication but mainly sensation), and only somewhat form. Depth is literally irrelevant to me, so i am wondering if it would be better for recovery (no dilation and less finicky) to avoid having a cavity created at all. I recently read the late 2016 thread about this, however I am also wondering whether anyone has any kind of recent results images of Chettawut, with or without a cavity.
I am not very keen on the idea of a penile inversion surgery, despite options being available in my city (Sydney, Australia), however if Chettawut's speciality is often said to be depth, and that is the least important factor for me, whether some rearrangements would need to be made.
Thank you in advance!
Rosie