Lazer vs Electrolysis: Why do both if unnecessary?
Ok, I've done what homework I can about both processes, including costs, effectiveness, good and bad lazer candidates, pain, time consumption, etc. I've even had a consultation with a Lazer tech. But I want an unbiased, (aka not someone answering based on profit margins,) answer. Is the reason to do both to save only to save on pain? If you know you're gonna need Electrolysis for at least half of your beard area hair, and lazer results are never guaranteed, wouldn't it be more cost effective to just go straight for the electro in the first place? Or is Lazer so much faster to cover a given area that even if it only gets 65% of your dark hairs, it still saves time and money?
Personally I have developed coarse blonde/greyish hairs that are just as thick and noticeable as the nearly black dark brown ones. The ratio is nearly 1 to 1 at this point. As a combat vet (long story) I have an incredibly high pain threshold, and am going to have to adapt to electro pain anyway. Am I better off doing both or just the Electrolysis. AKA, which saves more time, money or both?