According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006
Started by AnneK, October 05, 2017, 12:19:04 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
QuoteA new memo rescinds an Obama-era policy on gender-identity discrimination, setting the stage for a possible Supreme Court fight.
Quote from: Jailyn on October 05, 2017, 12:37:24 PMWell that was always going to happen eventually. It was always going to be at some point going to the supreme court or some higher up would take the mantle. Unfortunately no one seems to want to do real work in congress, the senate, or the president. I truly believe that the courts will do what is right and suit everyone. The fight is going to be a tough one but, hopefully will be worth it.
Quote from: Jenntrans on October 05, 2017, 02:25:02 PMI definitely agree Jailyn but can't give thumbs up yet it seems.But yeah I think the Supreme Court will decide in our favor but Congress should have doe this long ago in the EEO act to add us. But they didn't. Obama made it a policy but it needs to be law and the only ones that can do that is the Congress, both houses, or the Supreme Court deciding the Constitutionality of it. Since we all have to work then I will bet with the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness they will choose right. What is the alternative? Putting us all on welfare because we can't work?
Quote from: Lady Sarah on October 05, 2017, 04:52:41 PM trans people are not as likely to take up arms and protest like people did back then.
Quote from: Dee Marshall on October 05, 2017, 06:50:22 PMI don't know why you think the Supreme Court will necessarily decide in our favor. A lot of them are conservatives and strict constitutionalists.Because Dee the part about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That is secured within the Constitution. That is how same sex marriage was deemed Constitutional. With the Supreme Court it should not matter if they are Conservatives or Liberals. If so then they need to resign or get outed. They are there to give the final word on Constitutionality and not by party lines but by The Constitution itself. The Supreme Court should not have any political affiliations. LGBT is not within the confines of the Constitution but life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is though.
Quote from: AnneK on October 10, 2017, 04:26:18 PMJenntransThe constitution has not stopped biased or bigoted judges in the past. Have you seen this other thread and the article it links to?https://www.susans.org/forums/index.php/topic,229301.0.htmlYou might also read this article:http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/trump-judicial-nominee-abortion-rights_us_59d67a63e4b046f5ad96e117Do you honestly those people will stand up for our rights, when they so strongly oppose them? Incidentally, one of them, I forgot which, defied a Supreme Court order in some of his rulings.No, Trump is stacking the court with people who are openly hostile to the gay & trans communities.Good luck with your rights then.
QuoteYou may hate Trump or you may like Trump but one thing he is doing is forcing the House and Senate to do their jobs no matter how hard it may be. So the Senate and the House can only write laws allowing trans to openly serve in the military. Not an executive order from a president that thought he was a monarch. just sayin'.
Quote from: AnneK on October 12, 2017, 08:55:03 PMWell, look at the track record so far. Who was it that decided to ban trans from the military? Who is it that's enabling people to justify bigotry against trans or gays? Who is it that cutting health care to millions, while cutting taxes for the wealthy? At least Obama was doing things to help our community. Clinton was president 20 years ago, at a time that was less tolerant of gays & trans, so he was limited in what he could do, but he certainly didn't make it open season on us.