If the goal is to truly mimic ciswomen, then why not aim for estradiol levels typical of those seen at the beginning at thelarche, when girls begin to develop breasts and other female traits (secondary sexual characteristics)? Obviously, we know that if we did that, at those VERY very low levels of estradiol, we would barely notice anything and just this alone should signal to us that transsexual women are DIFFERENT and that we cannot use ciswomen as a reference for hormone levels.
The reason for the different responses in us and in them to pubertal levels of estrogens might be because girls at that age differ from us in terms of growth hormone levels, expression and activity of estrogen receptors, telomere length or quantity of stem cells, size/weight, prior exposition to hormones (very little androgens, thus no male skeleton or male secondary sexual characteristics), including the hormonal milieu in-utero, influencing their sensitivity to sex hormones at a later date, which some studies suggest this is very possible.
In the end, we just don't know what is right for transsexual women and rather than start with ciswomen, I think it would be more logical to start from scratch (i.e. tabula rasa) with every single transwoman. Then, through trial and error, we can find what works best for each and everyone of us, not by measuring estradiol levels but by instead measuring our well-being and overall feminization and let those determine what is the most effective DOSE for us. Some may end up only responding at much higher levels while some do quite well at much lower levels. Every individual is DIFFERENT.
However, IF there is one thing to be learned from ciswomen, it is that starting at the lowest effective dose may be best.