I had surgery many years ago with Chet circa 2003 and my result was great for its time. Was very young then and didn't really know much about vagina aesthetics, however despite the great function & depth & lubrication, I've come to be disappointed at the cosmetic appearance.
For what its worth, I have taken a look at recent results from Chet, and I think his style is still more or less the same, with perhaps improvements on his labia majora work. I didn't like how how also placed the drains then, which resulted in a keloid on my mons pubis area.
The cosmetic issues were apparent quite soon after surgery, and I've had some guys who I was out to comment on the differences when I asked them.
My main concerns are:
1. The fleshy? and loose appearance of the Labia Majora - it reminds me of a deflated scrotum in appearance?
2. The "gaping" look of the vagina when my legs are parted - looks more like a "/\" with the sides being the labia rather than a "()"
3. The short labia minora which ends at the bottom of the urethra area - this contributes to the gaping look.
4. The lack of the "oval" shape - I've come to learn the reason is due to the frenulum of the labium & the posterior labial comissure being non existent.
I'm wondering if anyone has gotten revisions to address the cosmetic lackings and if this is something even technically possible. Also, do share if you have similar concerns.
