Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Gender change without SRS.

Started by Sarah, January 04, 2008, 04:44:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Berliegh

Quote from: Stephanie Butterfield on February 08, 2008, 06:59:41 AM
Quote from: Berliegh on January 27, 2008, 04:46:32 AM
I see your living in the U.K......the only advice I can give you is to avoid the NHS (and most definitely Charing Cross GIC) as much as possible Fluffy.......don't do what I did and end up in a 7 year battle with them to try and access treatment..

Hi Berleigh and Fluffy,

I don't know your histories but if you pvt e-mail me, we can chat about what has gone wrong. There is nothing to be worried about using the NHS system for your Gender reassignment.

Its just that sometimes you have to be pro active, it is a long explanation, but is worthwhile knowing.

Stephanie

Get out of here Steph.....I've just been in meetings with my MP this afternoon to try and sort this crazy business out....Charing Cross GIC turned me down for a referral for Gender re-assignment surgery without providing an explanation......I've also been RLT for 5 years and have complied with the HBSOC and all clinic protocols. Not to mention the fact that Charing Cross mixed my medical file up with other patients. I've been fighting the NHS and CX for 7 years to get this resolved so don't you dare come in here and say there's nothing wrong with the NHS GIC system for your Gender reassignment.
  •  


Kimberly Kilpatrick

  •  

Jordan

Sarah,

Here in colorado we can get our Drivers license changed without SRS, You will need to get into theraphy though and possibly get HRT from a doctor to do so.

All you need is two letters to prove yourself... One letter from therapist and another from the doc...

Take care hun...
  •  

fluffy jorgen

Berliegh, so basically, we should move countries (in my case- again,) just because some freakshow can't sort themselves out, 'cause it will take just as long?

Ah, one thing that propper pisses me off too. I can't get breast reduction surgery 'till I'm 22 or something but others can get implants to make their breasts bigger when they're 18 like me! Unfair! It's not the money, apparently.
  •  

Berliegh

Quote from: fluffy jorgen on March 07, 2008, 11:18:53 AM
Berliegh, so basically, we should move countries (in my case- again,) just because some freakshow can't sort themselves out, 'cause it will take just as long?

Ah, one thing that propper pisses me off too. I can't get breast reduction surgery 'till I'm 22 or something but others can get implants to make their breasts bigger when they're 18 like me! Unfair! It's not the money, apparently.

I have spent 8 years trying to access some form of NHS treatment.......so I'm not going to waste another 8 years. I have had the Healthcare Commission, GMC, the PCT , my MP all asking Charing Cross GIC to provide some answers.......the NHS has been a waste of time in my case and I'm tired of fighting the system...

I've got to move on and look at other options....which may be overseas..
  •  

fluffy jorgen

  •  


cindybc

Hi Fluffy Jorgen,

Being scared is certainly a very human thing to feel. I believe you live in UK.  If so, then after what I have been reading, the crap that Berileigh has been informing us Charing Cross, it is certainly reason enough to be scared. Least ways especially if you are planning for SRS from a concern that is proving to be very incompetent, actually near to useless.

My bet would be that if their job is to be helping those suffering from GID, this place is not fulfilling or living up to the expectations of those who rely on them. My guess is that this might be a classic example of a government entity that is not intending on continuing to supply the service or obligations they are designed to do. Closure by NHS comes to mind for one.

Are there no other alternatives in the entire country of the UK where you can go for assessment and surgery? Is actually moving to some place in the Northern American countries possible for you? Not every one can afford to cross the crick to live with the chances of being able to obtain a job to sustain themselves.  Firstly, it costs a goodly amount of money to live in either U.S. or Canada. Then there might be a time where you may have to take a job with low pay, like McDonald's, on the account you won't be able buy a job in a higher position even if you are a university graduate.  Being trans, pre or post, might not help, either.

Cindy   
  •  

fluffy jorgen

Lol. No. Not scared of NHS.

I think I was being spontaneous when I wrote that I was scared and didn't want to expand on it 'cause lately I'm scared of my own shadow (literally! :/) never mind what'll happen in the future.

My uncle recently moved to Canada, suppose I'd be able to start off living at his, it is a long shot though, he's not very tolerant, plus, you're right, I'd need a lot of money to move there first, let alone... Time is of essence but fear of rejection is of essence too.

I think I'm gonna go back to my Therapist and ask her to find me a Gender Specialist. Currently, I'm just building my self- esteem, confidence (again) by just being able to "pass".

So glad I found this website though. It's given me a lot of advice and help, and the feeling of not being alone, already. Thanks!
  •  

Annwyn

I don't think that the definition of being a transsexual need include a desire for a genital alteration to become the other sex.

I think that such a view is biased and supports that gender is defined by the genitals.

I know, and plenty of you know, beautiful women who haven't had that operation, but are still women.  And the same is true for FtMs, just much more often because we can't get any competant doctors on their side to come up with a good way to mess around with things down there.

So, I don't think you should have to have SRS to change your gender.

Just my two cents:-)



On the flip side, I think it's pretty messed up for women to be going to lady's restrooms and have extra assets that they shouldn't have and likewise with the men.  I sure as hell wouldn't want a kid of mine, if I had one, sharing a private space with someone more capable of molesting her than anyone else in that room was.  I think that's why the government has to have their rules or whatever, because of what COULD happen.  People always run off fear these days.

Lol. I should make up my mind.
  •  

Beyond

Quote from: Annwyn on March 08, 2008, 06:54:32 AM
I don't think that the definition of being a transsexual need include a desire for a genital alteration to become the other sex.

I think that such a view is biased and supports that gender is defined by the genitals.

I know, and plenty of you know, beautiful women who haven't had that operation, but are still women.  And the same is true for FtMs, just much more often because we can't get any competant doctors on their side to come up with a good way to mess around with things down there.

So, I don't think you should have to have SRS to change your gender.

Just my two cents:-)



On the flip side, I think it's pretty messed up for women to be going to lady's restrooms and have extra assets that they shouldn't have and likewise with the men.  I sure as hell wouldn't want a kid of mine, if I had one, sharing a private space with someone more capable of molesting her than anyone else in that room was.  I think that's why the government has to have their rules or whatever, because of what COULD happen.  People always run off fear these days.

Lol. I should make up my mind.

That is one strange post.  I'm going to address the second part first.  People in transition have to use the restroom, what's your problem.  When you express what you did you sound like our detractors.  The vast majoritty of folks who abuse children are non-transsexual heterosexual males.  Such crimes by transgendered/treanssexual person are virtually unheard of.  Having "extra assets" is part of transition for MtF's.  Tell me do you feel FtM's are a danger because T makes them dangerous?  Seriously, for MtF's HRT basically kills the male sex drive.


Now the rest, my 2 cents, that most people aren't going to like, is the following:

If you don't want surgery(MtF) then you're not a transsexual, you're transgendered.  Yes there are a precious few who have valid medical reasons, but in my experience way too many people hide behind that as a reason.  Personally I would still have surgery because that how strongly I feel about it and that's a defining characteristic of being transsexual.  There are also people who choose to be "non-op".  Again, I think if you choose that that means you are transgendered, not transsexual.  The problem here is over the last decade people are trying to change the meaning of the word "transsexual".  Why can't they just accept that they're transgendered?

In that vein I've seen various on-line transsexual support forums starting to be taken over by transgendered folks.  I hate to say it, but Susan's transsexual board is like that.  Too many transgendered folks invading the transsexual board.

Labels DO matter.  A transsexual person (MtF) wants surgery. A transsexual person (MtF) wants the life they were denied, a woman's life.  To live that life to it's fullest you have to have surgery.  Until then there are many things you just can't experience.  If you even have to ask what those experiences are, you're transgendered and that's okay.

Next, many will claim poverty.  With Thailand offering MtF surgery for $5-10,000, no therapy, no problem, anybody should be able to afford that.  You don't want the surgery, that's okay, you're transgendered and that's okay.

Next, many will claim that surgery isn't advanced enough.  That is just an out and out lie.  Surgery today is very good.  You are simply transgendered and not transsexual, and that's okay.




I don't understand this fascination with claiming to be transsexual, when you are in fact transgendered.  I don't accept this attempted to change the meaning of the word "transsexual".  One thing I find particularly gauling is the origin of the word "transgendered".  The term was coined by someone who was a full-time crossdresser.  They didn't even claim to have ANY feelings of dysphoria, it was about the clothes.  Further this person claimed transsexuals didn't exist!  That person, who went by a female name, obviously doesn't speak for me.
  •  

cindybc

Hi Fluffy jorgen. Well i bought the entire block and now I am sitting on the other side of the fence looking back at the block I have just departed from. Hon just want to say that even after living as a woman for the last 7 years, I still feel fear now and again. I still worry about stuff. I am very much human and I bleed the same color blood as anyone else. Life can be very much fickled. Nothing is constant and even as a PSY I can't read the future or least ways it don't seem to work just by willing it.

I have been feeling about my most precious loving partner. I get this unreasonable fear about what would happen to me if she were to leave this life. I will not go any further except that I get these unsubstantiated fears. Now that I have found happiness in my life I certainly don't relish the Idea of loosing the biggest part of it. It doesn't mater if one is preop, or post opp, native American, French or a Martian without her space ship. I still feel fear and I have my emotional times. The fat tears that flow like miniature rivers on my cheeks I could a tribute to the estrogen. Tears are like bleeding the poison out of your system, they are good. But I also realise I can rise above my fears, all I need do is to do my best to make the right decisions and follow up on that decision makes for a much better life. Not perfect but good.

Jeeee I do hope you can decipher this post. 

Cindy   
  •  

fluffy jorgen

oh, i know, no physical change doesn't take away any of the other inner turmoil that makes one a human being.
i've come to dislike the Human Rights, the freedom of speech and the freedom to be yourself, the hell you can.

i don't have a partner, i have my mum to worry about. she has heart problems and i suppose i am a problem of her heart as well, metaphorically speaking. she's nearly had two heart attacks because of me already! without her, i'm homeless, futureless and all the other basic "less". meh. depressing period.

so, i'll go and bleed the poison out of my system now.
  •  

Annwyn

Quote from: Beyond on March 08, 2008, 07:48:33 AM
If you don't want surgery(MtF) then you're not a transsexual, you're transgendered.
When I saw this, all else blanked out.

Non operative transsexuals are still transsexuals.

Do NOT ever say something so bigoted, biased, uneducated, inconsiderate, and cruel ever again please.

Saying that one's genitilia determine the fullest extent of one's desired gender is beyond me.  I personally am mortally afraid of someone coming to mess around with my only functioning sexual organ.  Atleast I know this thing works if I ever want to use it.
  •  

NicholeW.

Quote from: Annwyn on March 08, 2008, 01:40:39 PM
Quote from: Beyond on March 08, 2008, 07:48:33 AM
If you don't want surgery(MtF) then you're not a transsexual, you're transgendered.
When I saw this, all else blanked out.

Non operative transsexuals are still transsexuals.

Do NOT ever say something so bigoted, biased, uneducated, inconsiderate, and cruel ever again please.

Saying that one's genitilia determine the fullest extent of one's desired gender is beyond me.  I personally am mortally afraid of someone coming to mess around with my only functioning sexual organ.  At least I know this thing works if I ever want to use it.


Ok, we all have opinions and as long as we feel no need to say things about one another, just about ideas and concepts, everyone stays on-the-board and gets to post with each other. So, please simmer down.

I have no idea what Beyond has experienced in her life, Annwyn. And no notion of what you have. But, I would imagine that everyone to a great degree forms her notions about things as her mind is affected by those experiences. Both you and she are allowed that.

To tell someone not to say something ever again seems like a rather bold attempt to suppress her writing her mind. But, exactly how would anyone enforce such a demand?

Her mind is what it is. Annwyn, your mind is also what it is. Both of you please let it be so this thread can progress with exchanges that can be heard. Not exchanges that degenerate into something that gets the thread locked, your posts deleted, the fighters banned or smited, or both, and everyone with a bad taste in their mouths.

Thank you both.

Nichole



  •  

cindybc

Hi fluffy jorgen at least I have learned more about who Fluffy Jorgan is. Ok I am not certain I can do anything for you at this time except say good luck and I will send a prayer.

Cindy

Posted on: March 08, 2008, 06:01:22 PM
Ok I don't want or intend to pick any bones with anyone, but I would have felt incomplete if I hadn't went through with it. I wanted to be as female as the medical profession could make me. I didn't give a pinch of coon ->-bleeped-<- even if the female part didn't work.

It's up to the individuals choice to do so or not, in some cases unfortunately some will never have the money to finish their journey or maybe some health issue will make it impossible to go through the whole procedure. 

Determining whether one is operable and another is not is a medical and psychiatric decision. I think we have had this discussion before and it never got anywhere that time either. As for anyone outside of this range of reasons, I guess it is their decision to make and be it. Whether they are trans or not is their decision to make.

Cindy
  •  

Wing Walker

Quote from: Beyond on March 08, 2008, 07:48:33 AM
Quote from: Annwyn on March 08, 2008, 06:54:32 AM
I don't think that the definition of being a transsexual need include a desire for a genital alteration to become the other sex.

I think that such a view is biased and supports that gender is defined by the genitals.

I know, and plenty of you know, beautiful women who haven't had that operation, but are still women.  And the same is true for FtMs, just much more often because we can't get any competant doctors on their side to come up with a good way to mess around with things down there.

So, I don't think you should have to have SRS to change your gender.

Just my two cents:-)



On the flip side, I think it's pretty messed up for women to be going to lady's restrooms and have extra assets that they shouldn't have and likewise with the men.  I sure as hell wouldn't want a kid of mine, if I had one, sharing a private space with someone more capable of molesting her than anyone else in that room was.  I think that's why the government has to have their rules or whatever, because of what COULD happen.  People always run off fear these days.

Lol. I should make up my mind.

That is one strange post.  I'm going to address the second part first.  People in transition have to use the restroom, what's your problem.  When you express what you did you sound like our detractors.  The vast majoritty of folks who abuse children are non-transsexual heterosexual males.  Such crimes by transgendered/treanssexual person are virtually unheard of.  Having "extra assets" is part of transition for MtF's.  Tell me do you feel FtM's are a danger because T makes them dangerous?  Seriously, for MtF's HRT basically kills the male sex drive.


Now the rest, my 2 cents, that most people aren't going to like, is the following:

If you don't want surgery(MtF) then you're not a transsexual, you're transgendered.  Yes there are a precious few who have valid medical reasons, but in my experience way too many people hide behind that as a reason.  Personally I would still have surgery because that how strongly I feel about it and that's a defining characteristic of being transsexual.  There are also people who choose to be "non-op".  Again, I think if you choose that that means you are transgendered, not transsexual.  The problem here is over the last decade people are trying to change the meaning of the word "transsexual".  Why can't they just accept that they're transgendered?

In that vein I've seen various on-line transsexual support forums starting to be taken over by transgendered folks.  I hate to say it, but Susan's transsexual board is like that.  Too many transgendered folks invading the transsexual board.

Labels DO matter.  A transsexual person (MtF) wants surgery. A transsexual person (MtF) wants the life they were denied, a woman's life.  To live that life to it's fullest you have to have surgery.  Until then there are many things you just can't experience.  If you even have to ask what those experiences are, you're transgendered and that's okay.

Next, many will claim poverty.  With Thailand offering MtF surgery for $5-10,000, no therapy, no problem, anybody should be able to afford that.  You don't want the surgery, that's okay, you're transgendered and that's okay.

Next, many will claim that surgery isn't advanced enough.  That is just an out and out lie.  Surgery today is very good.  You are simply transgendered and not transsexual, and that's okay.




I don't understand this fascination with claiming to be transsexual, when you are in fact transgendered.  I don't accept this attempted to change the meaning of the word "transsexual".  One thing I find particularly gauling is the origin of the word "transgendered".  The term was coined by someone who was a full-time crossdresser.  They didn't even claim to have ANY feelings of dysphoria, it was about the clothes.  Further this person claimed transsexuals didn't exist!  That person, who went by a female name, obviously doesn't speak for me.

Hi, Everyone,

Let's go back a few posts on this thread and remember that it dealt with changing the gender marker on one's driver's license and other identity papers to match their gender as they believe it to be, not necessasrily as it is on a birth certificate. 

Please see   http://www.ts-symposium.org/


Sounds like we may have met, Beyond. 

FYI, the term "transgendered" was coined by one Virginia Prince who was a full-time cross-dresser, as you accurately noted.

There are those who are non-op because their bodies cannot tolerate the GRS.  Some have had a castration and penectomy with the urethra moved to the normal position on the female body.  To them a skirt and top does not a transsexual make.  They have gone as far as they can and are not transgendered.  Ask anyone who is in that situation and they will be most enlightening.

There are those who cannot pay for the full GRS and for that reason go as far as they can.  They have every and all intent of being as close to their desired, non-birth gender as possible and they do what they can to be that way.

Transsexuals will move heaven and earth to be the gender they need to be, to make their bodies congruent with their hearts, souls, minds, personalities, views, etc. 

Transgendered persons, in my sole opinion, have no desire to change their bodies because their bodies and minds are already in harmony.  They need no changes except maybe whatever they wear in passing through their gender roles.

Sex may be defined by the genitals but gender goes much further and one's delight or dysphoria isn't solely determined by the appearance of the genitals.  What of our brothers and sisters who are born xxy or xxxy?  They might well be dysphoric by default and surgery could be their only recourse.

F to M persons may never get their surgery but I believe that it is in their hearts to make their bodies ***as congruent as possible.***   They have their reasons which likely don't include being able to call themselves transgendered. 

Who am I to say such a thing?  I sincerely, deeply, and greatly apologize to my F to M brothers but I wrote as I did to make my illustration of the TS continuum, and its difference from being transgendered as clear as I possibly could.

When ya get to the bottom line, it's the "bottom line" that makes the difference.

Humbly,

Wing Walker
Flying to GRS in July (I hope)
  •  

lady amarant

Personally, I don't care what label you wear. Me, I want surgery. The next gal down the line doesn't, for whatever reason. If she says she identifies as female though and feels she is a transsexual, who am I to deny her expression of self, and for that matter, who is the government? If you wish to be identified by a gender other than that of your birth, nobody has the right to deny you that. Official records should reflect that, and when it comes to bathrooms, screw it: Build single loo, unisex bathrooms. Relieves both physical and social pressure that way.
  •  

Jordan

Annwynn, No comon, no transsexual is gonna molest your child, especially if you are a good a parent, i mean if you are a bad parent and let you child wander for hours then your chances are slimmer, but...

And Beyond,

NO, non op TS men and woman are also Transsexual... Stop trying to redefine Transsexual...  :police:

_______________________________________________________

Back to this post, yes I do believe that it should be legal to change our birth certificates without SRS, some people go 20 years without getting it after living full time.... And then there are non-op TS woman, that are forced to live as male, is the line LEGALLY really based on genitals, thats whats whack....

Here here, to all the prior posts BTW,

PS. Cindi you are always so nice and calm.
  •