Quote from: Kate on April 03, 2008, 01:59:02 PM
Quote from: AlwaysAmanda on April 02, 2008, 04:33:21 PM
That sounds great... but the media still needs something to label us as 
Why?
Maybe that's the real problem. Why do they need to label ME into an US?
I'm not "a..." anything. I'm just Kate.
The very fact they need a label just shows that they think of people who change their sex as being freakish, odd, not normal... an aberration in need of watching. They label "us" so they can keep an eye on "us" and not let "us" blend in as the individuals we are.
I vote to ban the label altogether 
~Kate~
I know what
you would like to be called and I'd like to be called that too. A women. But that is not what happens.
I understand what you're saying(and agree completely) but they(media, general public, etc) are going to refer to those of us
as a groupas X until we have completed our transition and are stealth (if that is what we choose). After transition you are Kate
a women. But
during transition when we are being read, etc, and maybe for some of us that are never able to pass as female,or choose to be non-stealth is a different story, they
WILL label and stereotype us. You are an X, whether that is
Transsexual, Transgender, ->-bleeped-<-, etc. And after you are successfully living as a female you will need to tell people that need
to know (doctors) in a way that is not as distasteful as the term Transsexual.
Maybe it's just me, but I just think a better and less distasteful term needs to be applied. For one you can be MTF or FTM
so transsexual does not really cover it.
I have not heard anyone say they like the term (maybe one?) so if that's the case lets decide to change it. We as a group
can make that happen. How cool would it be to tell your friends one day in thirty years that you were part of a revolution
that changed what TS's were called. If we as a group don't stand up and do it, no one will and we will be stuck with all the
bad images that the word transsexual brings up. Maybe it's just not that big a deal to people, but to me the word has been so
unfavorably depicted in the past that we as a group will forever be scared with that term until it is changed.
I posted in another topic today about
Candice Cayne she plays Carmelita on
Dirty Sexy Money (tv show for those who don't know) and I think having one of our own is that successful
on prime time TV is HUGE. She advances public awareness that we can pass as women, we can be sexy,
we can be successful by leaps and bounds. If she is here by any chance... you ROCK Candice

She is a
transsexual, but I would only refer to her as that to make my point. She is a woman. Period. But the media
has to label her something... because she is non-stealth. She does not deserve to be labeled that and
neither do any of us.
This is no different than Negros, RedFaces, ->-bleeped-<-s and any number of other distasteful terms that have been applied
to groups of people in the past.
I've struggled my whole life with GID and for the past ten years or so when I really knew deep down inside that
I would have to face it at some point, one thing that was holding me back, was not wanting to be labeled TS, because
of the stigma and baggage that comes with that label. Maybe we can't fix things for ourselves, but how about giving
back and making it just a little bit easier for the ones that follow us?
LOL... and now I just have to laugh at myself... a few days ago I wanted to silently slip away into female-dom and now I feel
like I'm getting so worked up over what I DON'T want and refuse to call myself.
Amanda
Posted on: April 03, 2008, 04:49:59 PM
Quote from: Berliegh on April 03, 2008, 02:19:04 PM
There is a stigma attached to it far more than someone who may be gay.
That is SO true Berliegh,
SO TRUE. You can be gay and successful these days.... but if your TS you're
a barely passable, mentally ill, loser... according to the media.