Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

O, the Irony... (Controversy possible, please keep it nice)

Started by NicholeW., April 06, 2008, 11:44:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Could You transition under the early guidelines?

Yes
No, I am a male
No, I am female but am too tall or too heavy
Yes, but I refuse to a be sex object
yes, to hell with gatekeepers

Shana A

Quote from: Nichole on April 07, 2008, 04:58:27 PM

By then I was crying and they were fuming. A third cop showed up and cop one handed me a ticket for $54. They left. I sat and cried for about 5 minutes. Total time? 40 minutes on the side of a road while people slowed and stared.

Sorry that happened to you Nichole! And it stinks that you weren't able to press charges against the cops. There's no reason for them to treat you like that. Grrr.  >:( They need some serious diversity training!

Z
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

April221

I probably could have, but it's hard to say. I tried to get help in 1970. I had all kinds of things and feelings in my head since the age of 5 or 6 that didn't fit with a male body and social role. When I was  20 years old, I was single, 5' 7'' weighed about 120. I was totally passable with a minimum of makeup, and I freely dressed as I chose. I had no job and little money, so I went to whatever free clinics were available in San Francisco and the Bay Area at the time. I met with several counselors who had some experience with the Gay/Lesbian communities, but they were clueless as to what to do with me. Whatever help was available at the time was out of reach to me. Even now, some people will present for help with GID, and the therapist doesn't know anything about the SOC or in some cases, is  unaware that GID specialists exist. For some people, even today, finding help can be a challenge.

It's more than whether or not a person with GID could have been given help. Prior to about ten years ago, FINDING help was truly difficult. Trying to transition in those early years was a DIY sort of thing from the start, without the benefits of HRT, and FFS was not in existance. Forget about SRS. I was unable to find help in 1970, so whatever standards and guidelines existed were known by few professionals at the time.  If help could have been found, I wouldn't have been able to pay for it. The Internet has done a great deal of good in making both information and community available.  I wish that I had it years ago!
  •  

Natasha

sorry you had to put up with that kind of abuse nichole.
  •  

tinkerbell

I'm not a violent person by nature, but when I hear things like what Nichole has described, the Hannibal Lecter in me comes out.  I would love to find those a**holes in a corner, and..  :icon_bat: :icon_bat: :icon_bat:  >:( >:(

My heart goes out to you, Nichole, and I'm so very sorry you had to experience the ire of those %^&$#!

tink :icon_chick:
  •  

Nero

Quote from: Tink on April 07, 2008, 07:45:02 PM
I'm not a violent person by nature, but when I hear things like what Nichole has described.  The Hannibal Lecter in me comes out.  I would love to find those a**holes in a corner, and..  :icon_bat: :icon_bat: :icon_bat:  >:( >:(

My heart goes out to you, Nichole, and I'm so very sorry you had to experience the ire of those %^&$#!

tink :icon_chick:

my sentiments exactly. some men have no shame.  >:( so sorry to hear this, sweetheart. wish i had been there.
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

NicholeW.

I love your heart, Tink. Thanks so very much.

Thanks to Nero, Tasha and Zythyra as well.

My worry is that other women & men wind up experiencing very much of the same thing. And I'd rather they not. Decided that maybe I should just make an object lesson of myself. It can happen, and it isn't about looks, ID, letters and all of the things we think will protect us sometimes.

It's about what's inside of people and how they regard us all. I think we often forget that, so, hopefully someone will read that and remember.

I also have to admit that I would love to see you get those a**holes in a corner!!  :laugh: :laugh:

I'd PAY to just be there!!  :laugh:
:icon_hug: :icon_hug:

Nichole

  •  

mickiejr1815

i understand now that you're bi, guess i'm a little late Nichole. i worked with men everyday because of what i do, i really don't think i would be able to handle coming home to a man after working with the disgusting ones i do..lol. but to each girl their own i suppose.

all the best...
Mickie
  •  

Lori

I meet the height requirements, but I'm married and too heavy so I said to hell with the gatekeepers. Even if I got my weight down which I am working on daily, I'm still married.
"In my world, everybody is a pony and they all eat rainbows and poop butterflies!"


If the shoe fits, buy it in every color.
  •  

Lisbeth

5'8" was about the height limit.
That would disquality half the genetic women in Minnesota.  I'm a Scandinavian goddess.  Back then I was 5'10".

150# was about the weight limit.
Likewise, I was 175#.

One had to appear 'feminine' prior to any surgeries or HRT.
I was.  I've always looked feminine.

The woman could not be married/stay married.
I would have told them to go screw themselves.  On the other hand my ex overruled me.

Had to claim and live as a heterosexual.
I'm sorry, I can't be anything but bisexual.  But back then they didn't believe bisexuals existed.  Some people still don't.

Promise not to reveal that she was/had been TS after surgery.
It is to laugh.

She also generally had to live at least a year in gender-role without hormones.
I lived full-time for three years without hormones.

Her general presentation had to be that of Carol Brady or June Cleaver.
They can take a hike on that, too.  I would have been a bra burner.
"Anyone who attempts to play the 'real transsexual' card should be summarily dismissed, as they are merely engaging in name calling rather than serious debate."
--Julia Serano

http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2011/09/transsexual-versus-transgender.html
  •  

lady amarant

Quote from: Tink on April 07, 2008, 07:45:02 PM
I'm not a violent person by nature, but when I hear things like what Nichole has described, the Hannibal Lecter in me comes out.  I would love to find those a**holes in a corner, and..  :icon_bat: :icon_bat: :icon_bat:  >:( >:(

My heart goes out to you, Nichole, and I'm so very sorry you had to experience the ire of those %^&$#!

tink :icon_chick:

Oh yeah, count me in.

~Simone
  •  

Berliegh

Quote from: Nichole on April 06, 2008, 11:44:00 AM
In the 1960s, 70s and well-into the 80s the standard for transitioning through the therapists/endos/surgeons with gatekeeping was that women be small and thin/medium 5'8" was about the height limit. 150# was about the weight limit. One had to appear 'feminine' prior to any surgeries or HRT. In point of fact most gatekeepers didn't change the old ways before the DSM changes of 1994.


That's how it still is in the U.K, only much worse. But I didn't know anything about height restrictions. I'm small built and only 5' 7" and have lived 5 years RLT yet I have still been refused a referral from the psychiatrists at Charing Cross, London. They haven't given me an explanation.
  •  

lady amarant

Long Post. Sorry all, had a lot to say...

The saddest thing is that many of those older "standards" are still firmly in place the world over: In Brazil, you have to be passable, and beautifully feminine at that, to even be considered for transition; as I understand things, and I dearly hope I speak under correction here, the whole "you're an extreme version of gay - you should be attracted to your birth sex" attitude still holds sway in South Africa; And we all know and loathe the NHS requirement that you live as your target gender for a year, change your name and everything before they will consider you for HRT.

But you know, as much as that is society's fault, it is our own as well. We need something from them, so we end up doing whatever we need to to get that: Approval from therapists; Acceptance from friends and family; Legal recognition. We lied back then to get what we needed, and we lie now.

I'd go further though and say that many of us lie to ourselves as well. Or rather, not a lie exactly, but we internalise the definitions that are set for us: Witness how many TS people latch onto Blanchard and Bailey, or scratch out every crumb of new research or circumstantial evidence that might prove our biological origins.

But of course, we go further than that. We spew invective against this subgroup of TG, or that subgroup of LGBT. I've met one or two (okay, more than one or two) gay people who would be at the front of the queue to burn me simply for what I am, and the same can be said of the attitude some transsexual people have towards CD's, TV's and others, and some of the most racist people I have ever met were black.

We're human, and as such, we have an aching need to be understood and accepted, not just by society, but by ourselves too. As much as we are trans, I would contend that many of US are transphobic, simply because we were programmed to be that way. We latch onto anything that will legitimise it, to ourselves and we hope to others. I mean, I'll be honest here: The only reason I initially accepted myself as TS was because I started reading about the medical evidence and theories. Before that I really did know what I was, but I hatedhatedhated it, despised myself. I equated myself with all the negative protrayals I had seen in the South African media as a child, and even though I had rejected Christianity by the time I was 14, the narrowly moralistic programming it left behind still creeps up on me every now and again. I have to constantly watch my thoughts to prevent myself from falling into old patterns and beliefs. And I've lied. Lied to doctors, to family, to friends, all in abject terror that, if I did not present the right "face", they would reject me.

So when somebody like Thomas Beatie comes along to challenge that acceptance, to challenge the self image we've constructed as WOMAN or MAN, and perhaps more critically - present to the world, we go at him like a pack of wolves. Instead of granting that every one of us is unique, we try and kill what does not fit the little boxes.

I am a racist, sexist, classist, bigot. I am homophobic, transphobic, narrow-minded, and I judge people all the time. But we're human too. The definining thing that makes us human is free will - the capacity to choose. And that's not a religious platitude, but a reality. We can reason, we can inspect our thoughts and choose which ones we want to keep.

You're not an enlightened, accepting individual because you happen to expand what society accepts just enough to include yourself.

So thanks for reading, and today, as Nero's signature says: "I stand before you all, quite naked."

~Simone
  •  

Shana A

Quote from: lady amarant on April 08, 2008, 05:32:00 AM

I am a racist, sexist, classist, bigot. I am homophobic, transphobic, narrow-minded, and I judge people all the time. But we're human too. The definining thing that makes us human is free will - the capacity to choose. And that's not a religious platitude, but a reality. We can reason, we can inspect our thoughts and choose which ones we want to keep.

You're not an enlightened, accepting individual because you happen to expand what society accepts just enough to include yourself.

Fantastic post Simone!!!!!!

On an album I have, folksinger Utah Phillips talks about humans being inherently violent as similar to being an alcoholic. Says he wakes up every morning, looks in the mirror and says "Hi, I'm Utah, and I'm violent". Then he makes a conscious choice to act non-violently is his life. I believe it's pretty much the same regarding sexism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, classism, racism, etc. We've all internalized these stupid ugly things from negative societal conditioning, and it is up to us to make a choice as to how we think and act. We can be better than our programming. That's what I aspire to.

Zythyra
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

Kate

I'm so sorry Nichole, that's a terrible experience you went through. The godlike "cop attitude" (of a few, not most) + homophobia is a bad, BAD combination to deal with.

But the difference between you and I though, is that I assume you don't want male attention? That you could just never have a man look at you again and you'd be just fine with that?

Thing is, I WANT it. I want them to like me, I want them to find me attractive and desirable. And let's face it, men are biologically programmed to spread their seed amoungst healthy (aka "sexy") females without much regard for their personality. I'm perfectly fine with that. Those instincts aren't their fault, and to insist that they behave according to more female instincts (luring strong and stable providers into creating and raising babies with them) isn't exactly fair, IMHO. We do live in a civilized and evolved society, so those instincts have been incorporated into our culture to allow us to function together fairly, but they're still THERE. Many men walk around all day simply rating women as "do-able" or not, and many women look at men as "capture-able" or not. It's the game we play, and it'll be around until the end of time.

And it's a game I WANT to play, now that I'm on the correct side finally. I DO hear you, and appreciate the warning as I'll admit that I'm as naive as a 13-year-old girl right now, all giggly and dreamy over the prospect of FINALLY being able to flaunt my femaleness with men. But for whatever reason, men are *terrified* of me, so it's hard for me to realize the gravity of your warning. So far, they've always cowered to me (or ignored me utterly), becoming oddly meek and docile when dealing with me. Which is really ashame, as I WANT to be "adorable and cute" with them, not scary. But hey, SO BE IT, if that's how they're gonna treat me, then that's what I'll work with.

~Kate~
  •  

NicholeW.

Quote from: Kate on April 08, 2008, 08:53:19 AM

But the difference between you and I though, is that I assume you don't want male attention? That you could just never have a man look at you again and you'd be just fine with that?

Thing is, I WANT it. I want them to like me, I want them to find me attractive and desirable. And let's face it, men are biologically programmed to spread their seed amoungst healthy (aka "sexy") females without much regard for their personality. I'm perfectly fine with that. Those instincts aren't their fault, and to insist that they behave according to more female instincts (luring strong and stable providers into creating and raising babies with them) isn't exactly fair, IMHO. We do live in a civilized and evolved society, so those instincts have been incorporated into our culture to allow us to function together fairly, but they're still THERE. Many men walk around all day simply rating women as "do-able" or not, and many women look at men as "capture-able" or not. It's the game we play, and it'll be around until the end of time.

And it's a game I WANT to play, now that I'm on the correct side finally. I DO hear you, and appreciate the warning as I'll admit that I'm as naive as a 13-year-old girl right now, all giggly and dreamy over the prospect of FINALLY being able to flaunt my femaleness with men. But for whatever reason, men are *terrified* of me, so it's hard for me to realize the gravity of your warning. So far, they've always cowered to me (or ignored me utterly), becoming oddly meek and docile when dealing with me. Which is really ashame, as I WANT to be "adorable and cute" with them, not scary. But hey, SO BE IT, if that's how they're gonna treat me, then that's what I'll work with.

~Kate~

You'd be wrong in that assumption, Kate. I adore it when men give me attention.

I'll be very honest about that. And about this: I think on some level all women do so.

Now you may, and have, said: but you're a lesbian and you have a history of assault at the hands of males. What do you mean you crave and adore their attentions? I mean exactly that.

And furthermore I'm not ashamed of it, well, not on most days.

The other day a man told me that were I not committed and he wasn't committed he'd chase me 'like a dog chases a bone.' Yep, tingly and happy and proud of that. Even in light of the last event I told above.

What makes this so? I'm not certain, but I'll tell you what I think.

I think it has to do with ingrained conditioning.

I like being attractive to other women. Another lesbian intern has expressed some attraction to me. That feels good, but not, tbh, quite as good as those remarks and suggestions from men make me feel.

But, like other women and men I would rather have attention and compliments from the 'superior' sex. For that is exactly so ingrained in me, that men are rational, objective and to be desired for compliments and what they think is important, that I fall for that as much as you do. Although our current sexual orientations are different.

You see, women 'say things to be nice.' "Women lie to remain in relationship." "Guys say whatever they really mean." "Guys' opinions are more important than are the opinions of other women, or my own." Afterall, they are the preferred sex.

I know, bullcrap. Yet, just like Simone said up there, we internalize all that conditioning and actually at very deep levels believe it. I am not different than anyone else here or elsewhere in that respect. Except that I am aware of it and sometimes realize just how silly my responses are.

Like that singer Z mentioned, I have to consciously make an effort to realize that my conditioning defines my responses to such things as attention and compliments from men.

Nichole

Posted on: April 08, 2008, 04:23:23 PM
What was the point of this thread? That we internalize 'sexual objectification' in the same way that other women do. Our needs in some ways may differ from the needs of adolescent girls and women, but in the overall they remain the same: when one has a vested interest in being 'seen' as the object of a sexual attraction then she or he applies themselves to attaining that objective.

To be 'stealth,' to attract a member of another sex to ourselves, to receive praise for how we 'are seen' becomes an over-ridingly important occupation. One we often have so deeply ingrained within us that we  fail to recognize it for what it is.

We, like all people in our culture (Western) are innundated with images of what and who are 'attractive.' We long to attain that attraction and validation. Because, socially, that appears, at least, to be an ultimate attainment.

Yet, that very objectification is also the reason that we pay, sometimes, the cost of attainment in violence, degradation, depression and anxiety. If we 'pass,' if we are stealth and then outed we run a very real danger of being slain or maimed.

Is there another way? I'm not certain. We can talk about changing paradigms, but we must also look to the length and weight and speed of the 'train' we are trying to halt. That is overwhelming for the individual, less-so for a large political coalition: something like women of all sorts, GLBTs and men of understanding and dignity.

But, the force of advertising, 'reality' tv and other socially ingrained and supported uses of objectification will not quietly stop doing the things they do. There will be resistance and attacks. We will hear all sorts of dialogue about how 'useless' such projects are.

Yet, within ourselves we can make changes one at a time. But, that will also be difficult. I know this from personal experience and an inability to erase and expunge the very notions and goals that accede to such objectification within my own make-up and sense of self.

Thanks for your contributions to the thread. You all have given me things to ponder and for the most part the discussion has been polite and not given over to anger. It's led me to a line of research I had been looking for and toward a deeper evaluation of myself.

Thank you all.

Nichole
  •  

Ell

Hi Sage,

i know what you're saying here, but you have to remember that boys are pretty much in the same boat.

not only do we expect boys to be good-looking, we expect them to be bright, honest, gentle, and caring. and most of all, that they don't act stupid.

the entire feminist thesis is flawed. because, really, at the core of it all is a sad but true statement (now the title of a book i haven't read) which is, God hates ugly.

yes, now i am objectified, sometimes (thank heavens). the flip side of that coin is ignored.

but, i was sometimes objectified as a boy, too. (and i can't tell you how many times i was ignored)

neither is any good, but ignored is worse, for either sex.

unfortunately, you'll have to take this argument up with mother Nature. please ask her why she shaped human nature this way, and, if you would please, let me know the answer she gives you. i've been wondering about that one myself.

-ell
  •  

NicholeW.

Hi, Prophet In the Cave,

I don't disagree that we are all to some degree objectified. Just as the slave owner was objectified as he objectified his slaves.

As stated somewhere above the differential is that little ole measurement called 'power.'

A feminist thesis is flawed only when it loses track that one objectification is the reflection of the other, and, as you say, it manages to objectify both. A democratic and humane feminism doesn't do that. It celebrates biological diversity and works for releasing people from being objectified and toward being subjects.

The flaw with much of 'radical feminism' results in screeds like Janice Raymond's against males, heterosexuals, trans women and ignores trans men and androgynes altogether. Like much 'identity politics and philosophy' it demonizes and neglects what doesn't fit into circumscribed categories and objectifies what it perceives as the weakest link of the 'other side.'

Life isn't about sides, Prophet, but about recognizing integration, whether we like that or not.

Mom shaped human nature to be protean. She also gave us these brains to free ourselves, but we continuously use them to further circumscribe ourselves and attempt to make a changing universe static so we feel a sense of security.

Security seems of ultra-importance to those who content themselves with only the recognition of their own mortality. They ignore the fact of their coherence through time and space. The desire for security leads to all sorts of indescribably narrow boxes. Witness its repeated use by US politicians who wish to provoke fear in order to establish their own power and control.

N~
  •  

Ell

Quote from: Nichole on April 12, 2008, 02:33:59 PM
As stated somewhere above the differential is that little ole measurement called 'power.'

N~

But Tink said that she's actually gained power...
  •  

April221



When I was 20 years old, I was very passable, and liked to wear the mini skirt, etc., that was so very popular in 1970. I was known on the street, Telegraph Avenue, in Berkeley, California. and never had any problems, but one incident always stayed with me. The police drove by one afternoon, and asked me to please get into the car, that they needed to talk to me. They drove me just around the block, pulled over to the side, and stopped. They then explained to me that they were aware of what I was, and that I should be careful, as there was a very serious problem, both in Berkeley, and also San Francisco, with the very rapid rise in reports of rape, as well as other sexual assaults. From that point on, I felt the vulnerability that goes with being young, female, and attractive. Forget about any fantasies about how nice it will be to be wanted sexually by a man.  Reality is something else. Yes, it does feel good to be wanted. It gave me a wonderful feeling of being accepted as a woman, and more; but once I also became aware of my vulnerability in the real world, I learned to be much more like a genetic woman. Not all men are gentlemen, and some men are truly dangerous. Being lusted after is one thing. I can live with that, I enjoy it, but everything is viewed with an air of caution. I've always felt that "women's intuition" is to a large degree a survival tool, inbred into all women to allow the woman to survive the dating routine!
  •  

lady amarant

Quote from: ell on April 12, 2008, 05:28:08 PM
Quote from: Nichole on April 12, 2008, 02:33:59 PM
As stated somewhere above the differential is that little ole measurement called 'power.'

N~

But Tink said that she's actually gained power...

Perhaps though, it's not so much in gaining power as in knowing what to do with the power you have. As a male, I had access to the same power that cisgendered males do in terms of physical power, aggression and ambition, male privelage. But I never used it, because I didn't want it, nor did I know what to do with it.

Transitioning, we gain access to some of the tools of power members of our true gender have access to, and it fitting better, we DO gain power, in that we now know how to exercise it. However, do not make the mistake that males do still have all that unequal power for socio-economic, cultural and political reasons, and they DO know how to exercise it... usually against women.

~Simone.
  •