Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

O, the Irony... (Controversy possible, please keep it nice)

Started by NicholeW., April 06, 2008, 11:44:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Could You transition under the early guidelines?

Yes
No, I am a male
No, I am female but am too tall or too heavy
Yes, but I refuse to a be sex object
yes, to hell with gatekeepers

Nero

Quote from: ell on April 12, 2008, 05:28:08 PM
Quote from: Nichole on April 12, 2008, 02:33:59 PM
As stated somewhere above the differential is that little ole measurement called 'power.'

N~

But Tink said that she's actually gained power...

True. If one really thinks about it. Male and female power IS equal, but different. Men may rule the world, but men are ruled by women.
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

Chaunte


5'8"?!   150 lbs?! :icon_yikes:

hahahahahaha :icon_hahano:

I haven't been 5'8" for neigh on 35 years.  The last time I was even close to 150 lbs was when I used to dig holes in cemetaries.  Legally.  That would have been ... oh ... 1977 when I was a sophmore in college.

If you look at the "idealized" standards for a woman, I could see where and why these numbers were chosen, as well as the rest of the criteria.  This was when June Cleaver was considered the perfect woman.  I remember being raised to think that.

I'm not saying that it is right.  All I am saying is I undersatand where they were getting the standards from.

I would like to say that we have come a long ways since then.  And we have a long ways to go.

The Women's Movement changed the way that we, as a nation, viewed women in general.  I would like to that that, as a result, the standards for transitioning (mtf) were also changed.

Chaunte
  •  

Lisbeth

Quote from: ell on April 12, 2008, 05:28:08 PM
Quote from: Nichole on April 12, 2008, 02:33:59 PM
As stated somewhere above the differential is that little ole measurement called 'power.'

N~

But Tink said that she's actually gained power...

There are many kinds of power, and power is complex and varied.  Much of the power dynamic is who demands power?  And who is willing to let them have it?  The feminist perspective is about unearned power being demanded and reluctantly being granted because the grantor feels she has no choice.  Someone freely and willingly exchanging power with another is a whole different thing.
"Anyone who attempts to play the 'real transsexual' card should be summarily dismissed, as they are merely engaging in name calling rather than serious debate."
--Julia Serano

http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2011/09/transsexual-versus-transgender.html
  •  

Keira


I'm not 5 foot 8, but my Waist to hip ratio is now 0.69 which is miss world territory and I'm 6 foot
tall (which most models are), so hey maybe I had squeeked by under the make them have
a boner rule  ;)
  •  

Shana A

Quote from: Nichole on April 12, 2008, 02:33:59 PM
The flaw with much of 'radical feminism' results in screeds like Janice Raymond's against males, heterosexuals, trans women and ignores trans men and androgynes altogether.

Nobody was really identifying as androgyne back when Raymond wrote TS Empire. This seems to be relatively recent, just the last few years. Of course there were FTMs but that didn't fit into her thesis.

Z
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

debbie j

Quote from: Lisbeth on April 12, 2008, 06:13:50 PM
Quote from: ell on April 12, 2008, 05:28:08 PM
Quote from: Nichole on April 12, 2008, 02:33:59 PM
As stated somewhere above the differential is that little ole measurement called 'power.'

N~

But Tink said that she's actually gained power...

There are many kinds of power, and power is complex and varied.  Much of the power dynamic is who demands power?  And who is willing to let them have it?  The feminist perspective is about unearned power being demanded and reluctantly being granted because the grantor feels she has no choice.  Someone freely and willingly exchanging power with another is a whole different thing.

indeed Lisbeth that is so very true  :)
  •  

Ell

anyway, to answer your query, Sage, i guess i couldn't because of height.

still, i don't quite see the point of all this.

i don't see the point of railing against medical establishment gatekeepers, unless you'll also note how much they help. since i have to include my therapist, endocrinologist, and psychiatrist in that group, i'd have to say they help alot.

as for feminists, i appreciate that they have done much good for women. but they have also done much harm to that most important realm of child-rearing and stay at home moms. talk about taking away a woman's dignity! this in turn has done a great deal of damage to the culture and quality of life of children.

and i used to hate feminists for their male-bashing.

but i don't hate them so much anymore, because now i see that they have left a huge vacuum of soft female space in their wake. yes, i'm an anti-feminist, child rearing, soft female! i am very subservient to men (if they are polite). the other day, three young men all took a step back as i passed them in the parking lot, and i was tickled to death. i know! it's old-fashioned of me. but i honestly enjoy that little role. and men, who often haven't seen the likes of such behavior, ever, seem to be like, "what? is this for real? a soft female? i didn't even know they existed." and they graciously provide female space for me.

well, i'm more than happy to move into that space.

-ell
  •  

Keira


I'm not sure they really help since they
apply things to us with close to zero knowledge.
There's so little real studies of TS
and those done are so flawed, that at
saying they help is going way beyond what they actually offer.

Psychiatrist know zilch about what makes a TS, and if
its mainly physically driven, then what they do is misapplied.

Endo's there's zero real studies of TS and not likely to ever
be seeing how complex this area is and how expensive it
is to study it. Even studying HRT for women has probably
cost several billion dollars till now and there's still no conclusion....
So, its all empirical results, which we could get ourselves from
reading the recommended dosages spread all over the net
(they are the same guideline as what they use).

The doctors help, but they're not specifically linked to gender,
I would get my health checked for about the same things
regarldess of taking HRT or not.

I could go on like that...

In truth, the current system is put in place for legal reasons mostly,
if the doctors prescribe or operate something,
they must be a reason to do so.
Same thing for insurances, they need a justification for paying for HRT
and paying for SRS.

Right now, since TS's are self-declared, they have to put somebody
to insure those further downstream that people are not doing something
"crazy".

But, there would be other solutions,  at least for the legal aspect of this.
Informed consent would insure that you know the implications of what your asking.
That's enough for major plastic surgery... Which are mostly on demand even
if you ask something quite crazy. Though, that doesn't cover medication
(strange you can ask to have your face cut on demand but HRT is not given
the same consideration...).

The second issue, insurance is a more thorny one, since removing the gatekeeper would
mean that you would lose insurance coverage.

That's one of the reason some people don't want GID to not be a mental illness and
instead are pushing for it to be a physical illness. Problem is that for now, there's no
real definite proof of the latter.










  •  

Lisbeth

Quote from: ell on April 12, 2008, 10:46:23 PM
as for feminists, i appreciate that they have done much good for women. but they have also done much harm to that most important realm of child-rearing and stay at home moms. talk about taking away a woman's dignity! this in turn has done a great deal of damage to the culture and quality of life of children.

and i used to hate feminists for their male-bashing.

but i don't hate them so much anymore, because now i see that they have left a huge vacuum of soft female space in their wake. yes, i'm an anti-feminist, child rearing, soft female! i am very subservient to men (if they are polite). the other day, three young men all took a step back as i passed them in the parking lot, and i was tickled to death. i know! it's old-fashioned of me. but i honestly enjoy that little role. and men, who often haven't seen the likes of such behavior, ever, seem to be like, "what? is this for real? a soft female? i didn't even know they existed." and they graciously provide female space for me.

Sweetheart, I want you to understand that there are five different kinds of feminists: Liberal, Cultural, Socialist, Radical, and Postmodern.  Only Radical Feminists are the male-bashing kind.  You and I will also eventually have to deal with the fact that I am a Postmodern Feminist.  I am sympathetic to the Liberal and Cultural Feminists.  I disagree with the Socialist and Radical Feminists.

Your Lisbeth
"Anyone who attempts to play the 'real transsexual' card should be summarily dismissed, as they are merely engaging in name calling rather than serious debate."
--Julia Serano

http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2011/09/transsexual-versus-transgender.html
  •  

cindybc

Wow! I didn't know there were that many separate classifications for feminists.

Well I worked for 8 years as a social worker with other women workers and my boss was a woman, wonderful lady. And here I will be starting a volunteer job in a woman's shelter and never encountered any problems.

Hi Ell
Quote"what? is this for real? a soft female? i didn't even know they existed." and they graciously provide female space for me.
I'm with you Ell, I certainly ain't about to to rock the boat. I don't like rocking boats anyway. I leave that up to Wing Walker the professional boat rocker. "soft female?" Realy??? This is getting is interesting. Pushing women into the work force? I also agree that the results are not good especially when it comes to the children. I had enough kids in my care to know some about that, I was lucky that I only had to work for four hours each day Rural Mail delivery between 11 am and 3:00 pm So I was home to send the kids to school and be there for them when they got home from school.

Cindy

  •  

Jamie-o

Quote from: ell on April 12, 2008, 10:46:23 PM

as for feminists, i appreciate that they have done much good for women. but they have also done much harm to that most important realm of child-rearing and stay at home moms. talk about taking away a woman's dignity! this in turn has done a great deal of damage to the culture and quality of life of children.

and i used to hate feminists for their male-bashing.

but i don't hate them so much anymore, because now i see that they have left a huge vacuum of soft female space in their wake. yes, i'm an anti-feminist, child rearing, soft female! i am very subservient to men (if they are polite). the other day, three young men all took a step back as i passed them in the parking lot, and i was tickled to death. i know! it's old-fashioned of me. but i honestly enjoy that little role. and men, who often haven't seen the likes of such behavior, ever, seem to be like, "what? is this for real? a soft female? i didn't even know they existed." and they graciously provide female space for me.


I agree with you to an extent.  I think that many of our nation's problems can be traced back, in part, to a couple generations of kids who have pretty much been left to raise themselves.  Whether from ambition or from economic necessity, parents are frequently not around to guide their children into thinking beyond themselves, or acting as part of a responsible member of their communities. Besides which, just as women should not be forced into the role of June Cleaver, neither should they be forced into the roll of Ms. Corporate Ballbreaker.

I also think we, as a society, are doing men a disservice by forcing them into the same old "boys don't cry", "men have to be tough" attitudes, while simultaneously taking away their only positive roles as protector, provider, and knight in shining armor.

HOWEVER...

Having been raised by a mother who grew up in the 50's and 60's, and who had feminist leanings, I have heard about what it was like before feminism, and I can state unequivocally that, so long as I am forced to live in a female body, I will be eternally grateful for the feminists who have brought us to the point we are at today.

Some examples:

*When my mother was applying for school, most of the top universities (if they accepted women at all) had quotas of the number of women they would accept, after which they took men with less qualification.  (As I recall, Stanford, for instance, was 10%) 

*At the school she went to, women were required to wear skirts unless it was -50 degrees out. (It was frequently -30.) 

*Her roommate was constantly being campused because she couldn't get back from her job as a nurse in time for the 9 o'clock curfew, which was only imposed on female students.  This had to be especially galling for a woman in her late twenties, who had been taking care of herself for years.  But female students were required to live in the dorm, regardless of age. 

*As a working woman, my mother was turned down for jobs and denied promotions because, "You'll just be running off to have children, so it would be a waste to give you that position."

It's because of the feminists that women have the choices they have, that sexual harassment is no longer acceptable in the workplace, and that our daughters celebrate "girl power", rather than being reminded daily of their second class status.

Did feminists go too far?  Yes, sometimes they did.  But sometimes you have to push too far to bring the status quo back to where it needs to be.



And, having finished my rant, back to the topic of the post: I'm afraid I would have 3 strikes against me. 1. I'm male, 2. I'm gay, and 3. even if I were straight, and they accepted FtMs, I'm much too short to ever be a chick-magnet.  :P 
  •  

Ell

Quote from: Lisbeth on April 13, 2008, 12:29:43 AM
Sweetheart, I want you to understand that there are five different kinds of feminists: Liberal, Cultural, Socialist, Radical, and Postmodern.  Only Radical Feminists are the male-bashing kind.  You and I will also eventually have to deal with the fact that I am a Postmodern Feminist.  I am sympathetic to the Liberal and Cultural Feminists.  I disagree with the Socialist and Radical Feminists.

Your Lisbeth

oh, hi Sweetie. i'm actually supportive of equality in jobs, pay, etc. and i think it's ridiculous that the ERA never passed. (of course, the ERA itself is ridiculous, because women's rights are already clearly covered by the Bill of Rights).

-ell
  •  

Lisbeth

Quote from: ell on April 13, 2008, 12:36:05 PM
Quote from: Lisbeth on April 13, 2008, 12:29:43 AM
Sweetheart, I want you to understand that there are five different kinds of feminists: Liberal, Cultural, Socialist, Radical, and Postmodern.  Only Radical Feminists are the male-bashing kind.  You and I will also eventually have to deal with the fact that I am a Postmodern Feminist.  I am sympathetic to the Liberal and Cultural Feminists.  I disagree with the Socialist and Radical Feminists.

Your Lisbeth

oh, hi Sweetie. i'm actually supportive of equality in jobs, pay, etc. and i think it's ridiculous that the ERA never passed. (of course, the ERA itself is ridiculous, because women's rights are already clearly covered by the Bill of Rights).

-ell


Well, beloved, that puts you in the Liberal Feminist category.  *kiss*

Posted on: April 13, 2008, 01:13:41 PM
Quote from: Lisbeth on April 13, 2008, 12:29:43 AM
I am a Postmodern Feminist.  I am sympathetic to the Liberal and Cultural Feminists.  I disagree with the Socialist and Radical Feminists.

QuoteThe True Feminist
You are 88% on your way to being a Feminist!

You are a fellow Patriarchy Blaming Feminist, my bosom-buddy in the Sanctimonious Women's Studies set. You know sexism where you see it, and you're not afraid to call it out! You know a lot about Feminism, and you got your head on straight when it comes to politics too. In general, you're just pretty awesome and you judge people for who they are, not what arrangement of parts they have and the roles they are expected to play.

P.S.
If you liked my test and want to bitch about sexism and talk about Feminism with me, feel free to message me. Us Feminists got to stick together!

The Feminist Test written by proudfeminist on OkCupid, home of the The Dating Persona Test.

View My Profile(proudfeminist).
"Anyone who attempts to play the 'real transsexual' card should be summarily dismissed, as they are merely engaging in name calling rather than serious debate."
--Julia Serano

http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2011/09/transsexual-versus-transgender.html
  •  

NicholeW.

 :)

Same rating basically, 89%. Dja write the test, Lisbeth?
  •  

Keira

The problem I have with all this abstrct discussion of feminism here
is that it doesn't seem to relate at all to the lives of most
women I know. I'm in university right now in my PR degree
which is about 85% female from 22-40, with most in their
late 20's and these women don't believe there is
any limitation to what they can't do.

They do see relents of past discrimation that's being
worked out of the system, but with 60-65% (in Quebec)
of people in university being women, its ineluctable that
eventually, they will have the economic levers of power.
You can't stop a rising tide. When there will be enough
women in place at all levels they'll take over and
many men will be wondering where it all went wrong!!!

If anythihg, men need their own equivalent
of the feminist revolution of the 70's so they
can break free of their gilded prison.

What will remain in 20 years, men will be left
with physical intimidation as their only means
of power by then if things continue the way
its going now.

There is a tipping point coming,
and mysoginy as a last stand,
especially in politics, will
be the last frontiers,
since men will have
the equal numbers there for some time yet.
Reactionary forces will be on the losing end of history,

Men will have to change or they will the seed of their
own destruction. It is not feminism that's driving
men down right now, but their own conservatism
as a whole.

  •  

Lisbeth

Quote from: Nichole on April 13, 2008, 07:49:16 PM
:)

Same rating basically, 89%. Dja write the test, Lisbeth?

Nope.

Quote from: Keira on April 13, 2008, 08:55:14 PM
There is a tipping point coming,
and mysoginy as a last stand,
especially in politics, will
be the last frontiers,
since men will have
the equal numbers there for some time yet.
Reactionary forces will be on the losing end of history,

Yes, here, too, the majority of college students are women, and they are going out to fill the ranks of middle management.  But the "glass ceiling" is still in place, and only 1 1/2 percent of the corporate leaders, the presidents and CEOs, are women.  For this revolution you are talking about to take place, women must not only control the intellectual capital that comes from education, but also money and power.  That will be a long time in coming.  Those with money and power do let it go lightly.

I cannot get the image out of my head of the woman deligate to the 2003 Republican National Convention who said, "Laura Bush is a real lady.  She knows her place."  There are far too many women who have internalised that sexism for me to believe that change will come quickly.  Reactionary forces always are on the losing end of history, but last stands are always very bloody affairs.  The United States is becoming a dangerous place to live.  For anyone who is in a stigmatised group: people of color, women, LGBT people, immigrants.  I can feel the grip on our rights slipping.
"Anyone who attempts to play the 'real transsexual' card should be summarily dismissed, as they are merely engaging in name calling rather than serious debate."
--Julia Serano

http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2011/09/transsexual-versus-transgender.html
  •  

Keira


I don't think the glass ceiling really exists anymore.
Most of the diffence in pay can be accounted for women
working less hours, less dangerous work, less part time work, etc.
The remaining part can be accounted by women working in
traditionally female occupations (like data entry) which
were paid less and women being less experienced
than the men (since they've entered the market
in great numbers later, especially in the jobs that pay more).

After all that, there does exist a bias built from mysoginy, but
it is crumbling because of the intense global competition makes
the old boys club and nepotism economically unviable.

Its good old capitlism that will make women triumph.
Companies need all their best resources just to survive
and sexism in promotion can only lead to self-destruction
of the company unless everybody does it (which you
can no longer assure (you could in the 70's).





  •  

tekla

Those with money and power do let it go lightly.  -- I'm not sure they ever let it go at all.  In the course of history they often go right down to the old chopping block with it.  But cultural revolutions happen more slowly, as one generation dies off, its attitudes tend to perish with it.  And, though things are not perfect, change has happened.  And younger generations have their own way of creeping in.  Twenty years ago there were almost zero female stagehands.  Now we have a pile, and they all got in through the Rock and Roll door.  Rock started hiring female hands and techs when no other aspect of show biz would.  Do some of the 'old timers' have problems with it - yup, from time to time.  Oh well. 

Its good old capitlism that will make women triumph.  Companies need all their best resources just to survive and sexism in promotion can only lead to self-destruction of the company unless everybody does it (which you can no longer assure (you could in the 70's).

Well, it worked for racism pretty much that same way.  In the end it will work out that way for TG also.

Reactionary forces always are on the losing end of history, but last stands are always very bloody affairs.  --  Yes, because the ones in power have, well, power, and can hold on long past the point of reasonable departure. 

The United States is becoming a dangerous place to live.  For anyone who is in a stigmatised group: people of color, women, LGBT people, immigrants.  I can feel the grip on our rights slipping.
  --  Oh boy O, and then some.  Nor do I have any hope that the next occupant of 1600 is going to roll it all back either.  Make a couple of symbolic changes, but nothing major - they passed the Patriot Act, effectively suspending major sections of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Magna Carta (don't ever let anyone accuse them of thinking small, they did what every British King since 1215 had only been able to dream about).
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

Ell

still, i will resist their depredations with tenderness and a spiritual self. what else can i do? without these things, i wouldn't like myself, and i'd probably go crazy.

-ell
  •  

Lisbeth

Quote from: tekla on April 14, 2008, 09:39:02 AM
Its good old capitlism that will make women triumph.  Companies need all their best resources just to survive and sexism in promotion can only lead to self-destruction of the company unless everybody does it (which you can no longer assure (you could in the 70's).

Well, it worked for racism pretty much that same way.  In the end it will work out that way for TG also.

Did it now? *shakes head*

Quote from: ell on April 14, 2008, 10:39:30 AM
still, i will resist their depredations with tenderness and a spiritual self. what else can i do? without these things, i wouldn't like myself, and i'd probably go crazy.

-ell

That's all most of us can do.
"Anyone who attempts to play the 'real transsexual' card should be summarily dismissed, as they are merely engaging in name calling rather than serious debate."
--Julia Serano

http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2011/09/transsexual-versus-transgender.html
  •