Hi, Alice
Quote from: Alice V on May 03, 2019, 04:40:25 AM
Actually, I don't agree with some Ashley statements. Seriously, we should trust people to diagnose their mental health? Why do we need psychiatrists then?
I agree with you, Alice.
To quote from the article:
QuoteIf someone says, 'My arm hurts,' we typically grant credence to their claims.
This is true. However, if someone tells a doctor "I have a hairline fracture in my ulna" I believe taking an x-ray is justified.
QuoteThe assessment requirements is [sic] predicated on the idea that there are "true" trans people, and "false" trans people, Ashley said in an interview with the National Post.
Hmm. I believe there are also people who get fixated on things they've heard about. When I started reading medicine as a child, I felt alarmed that many of the symptoms described in the textbooks seemed to fit me. Again, had I gone to the doctor to say I've got, say, leprosy, I would certainly hope that he'd have made sure I really had it before writing a prescription.
QuoteAnd the illness model is, 'Well, we have to figure out what this illness is because there is this underlying 'disease' we have to cure.
As I understand it, some illness/disorder has to be diagnosed for insurance to cover a procedure. Since Ashley appears to be talking about Canada, I assume the costs are covered by some form of national health insurance. Of course it is true that when one pays for the surgery and/or hormone therapy on one's own, informed consent may well suffice. However, even so I would hope that some assessment is made before commencing.
I'm afraid to quote the next paragraph, as I believe that including too much text of the article constitutes a terms of service violation, but to me its discussion of pubertal changes is the crux of the article.
I went through puberty. I was looking at old photographs today, and they made me hurt. I completely agree that arresting my development before the changes occurred would have spared me immense pain.
I do believe that immediate intervention in the form of blockers to every child on the brink of puberty who asks for an assessment will overall cause less harm than allowing those who do transition to undergo pubertal changes. In fact, this is a point I myself strongly stressed when discussing the matter with my referring psychiatrist. I do not, however, believe that immediately prescribing hormones on demand without any assessment is the right thing to do.
In the article Ashley also mentions "gender euphoria" as motivation for seeking hormone treatment. In this case, judging from the article, the seeker is not unhappy with one's body, but just feels overjoyed at the thought of having female fat distribution. I really don't see how this relates to the subject of transsexual children. To me, if a child is overall healthy, happy and well balanced, it would seem that the risks would outweigh the merits. (I can't but think of a situation where steroids are prescribed to a boy who "feels overjoyed" at the thought of having huge muscles.)
Overall, though, I get the feeling that the article may perhaps be exaggerating or reorganizing Ashley's comments. The end part seems to indicate that what she wants is an informed consent approach for
older teens and patients. What I find very interesting that the only mention of blockers in the article is in a comment by the gender clinic at B.C. Children's Hospital. I would certainly hope that their use would be a logical first step in any treatment plan for children—and believe that Ashley would also be aware of it. I'd be rather surprised if she hadn't mentioned them at all in her paper or during the interview.
Quote from: Alice V on May 03, 2019, 04:40:25 AMRight now I'm waiting for my own psychiatrist diagnose my mental health, because, you know, I wanna be healthy Alice, not crazy one.
So am I. In adults, whose pubertal changes have already taken place, the situation is not as urgent. After recently (to my great surprise) suddenly finding myself eligible for non-private treatment, I myself am quite resigned to waiting. I don't like to, but do understand that the purpose of the assessment procedure is to ensure that a few loud regretters will not emerge to endanger public funding for those who desperately need the treatment.
There are other things about the assessment procedure that I
do find extremely frustrating—but discussing them on an open forum would reveal too much personal information. I only hope that these aspects will eventually be addressed so others will not need to go through what I will...
Anyway, I've known what I feel since an extremely early age, and expect the process, once it starts, to go smoothly. I also expect it to be interesting.