Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Judge blocks Trump from cutting off gender-affirming care for federal inmates

Started by Jessica_Rose, June 03, 2025, 12:48:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jessica_Rose

Judge blocks Trump from cutting off gender-affirming care for federal inmates

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-blocks-trump-from-cutting-off-gender-affirming-care-for-federal-inmates/ar-AA1G15IC?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=07513df54de7493e83c1536b114e4d70&ei=49

Story by Katelyn Polantz and Devan Cole (3 June 2025)

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Trump administration to continue providing gender-affirming medication for transgender inmates in federal prisons...

"All parties seem to agree that the named plaintiffs do, in fact, need hormone therapy," US District Judge Royce Lamberth wrote.

The preliminary injunction from Lamberth means that officials within the Bureau of Prisons cannot enforce guidance the agency's leadership issued earlier this year implementing President Donald Trump's order, which directed the agency to revise its policies to "ensure that no Federal funds are expended for any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate's appearance to that of the opposite sex."

Lamberth, an appointee of former President Ronald Reagan, said a group of transgender inmates who had been medically diagnosed with gender dysphoria and who challenged BOP's guidance implementing the president's order were likely to succeed on their claim that the agency violated federal rulemaking procedures.

"Nothing in the thin record before the Court suggests that either the BOP or the President consciously took stock of—much less studied—the potentially debilitating effects that the new policies could have on transgender inmates before the implementing memoranda came into force," Lamberth wrote in the 36-page ruling.

"The BOP may not arbitrarily deprive inmates of medications or other lifestyle accommodations that its own medical staff have deemed to be medically appropriate without considering he implications of that decision."
Journal thread - Jessica's Rose Garden
National Coming Out Day video - Coming Out
GCS - GCS and BA w/Dr. Ley
GCS II - GCS II and FFS w/Dr. Ley
FFS II - Jaw and chin surgery w/Dr. Ley
Hair - Hair Restoration
23Mar2017 - HRT / 16Feb2018 - Full Time! / 21Feb2019 - GCS / 26July2019 - GCS II / 13Oct2020 - FFS II
"It is never too late to be what you might have been." - George Eliot
  • skype:Jessica_Rose?call
  •  
    The following users thanked this post: Lori Dee, Lilis

Lori Dee

I would think that would also violate the 8th Amendment protection against "cruel and unusual punishment". It is bad enough that they need "protective custody" to prevent becoming victims of violence.
My Life is Based on a True Story
Veteran U.S. Army - SSG (Staff Sergeant) - M60A3 Tank Master Gunner
2017 - GD Diagnosis / 2019- 2nd Diagnosis / 2020 - HRT / 2022 - FFS & Legal Name Change
/ 2024 - Voice Training / 2025 - Passport & IDs complete
  • skype:.?call
  •  
    The following users thanked this post: Lilis

persphone

Quote from: Jessica_Rose on June 03, 2025, 12:48:51 PM"Nothing in the thin record before the Court suggests that either the BOP or the President consciously took stock of—much less studied—the potentially debilitating effects that the new policies could have on transgender inmates before the implementing memoranda came into force," Lamberth wrote in the 36-page ruling.

This judge and their ruling are a bright spot to my day! Thanks for posting this news!