"Your Team Obama site likes to throw politically correct buzz words around such as "transgender brothers," "transgender sisters," "Pride season," "LGBT Americans," "Stonewall riots," "LGBT Rights," and "transgender workers.""
So there's some nefariousness at work when people recognize other human beings as human? I don't see this as politically correct, rather as humane.
"I have heard Obama say: "Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us." Therefore, Christians feel pressure to sacrifice their faith for the sake of "unity." Questioners are "dividers." Followers are "unifiers.""
How does this differ at all from what McCain's people do? Or anyone who has ever actually run for PUSA and their handlers have done? I don't know how that would play in Australia, but here it is de rigeur.
"Colorado's Team Obama argues that "transgender workers" are just victims "who ask for the simple dignity of being judged by the quality of their work." Yet, Democratic Party hysterics hypocritically spend their days condemning Christians."
I've never seen or heard of blanket condemnations of Christians by any mainstream USA party. To do so would be suicidal with around 80% of the population identifying themselves as Christians.
"Obama's disciples tell you that America's founding fathers were transgender-friendly pioneers. "It's time to live up to our founding promise of equality by treating all our citizens with dignity and respect." History is "Herstory" too."
I don;'t think anyone would deny the importance to human history of more than half of the historical population. Herstory is important as well as His-story. The "Founding Fathers also believed black Americans were only 3/5 of a person. Yes, USA life evolves, thank goodness. The "Founders" never imagined multi-national conglomerates or electric lighting either. We should go bacl to that to maintain purity? Nor, by and large were the ones we mostly read about Christian, they were primarily Deists.
"Team Obama refuses to talk about the LGBT photographs it edits and why. But, recall, that to question Obama is to "attack Obama." So, for instance, followers must ignore the fact that LGBT groups "drag" children to their parades."
Conservatives don't bring their children to parades and rallies? Or is "drag" the operative word here? More liberal people "drag" their children? More conservative ones "carry" theirs? So far, "intellectual" doesn't seem to apply.
"Your local Obama cell feels a great sense of devotion to the "lesbian soldier" because she allegedly "wants nothing more than to serve her country openly and honestly" – but undermines the rights of marines to pray in public, or wear crosses."
I always wore a crucifix while serving in the U.S.A. military. It was military issued, in fact. That has changed? I rather think not. Anyone can pray publically legally; Jesus suggested that private prayer was more efficacious. Perhaps that should be noted?
"Your Obama group wants the Red Feds to run over the states. "Let's enact federal civil rights legislation to outlaw [so-called] hate crimes and protect [LGBT] workers against discrimination." Judeo-Christian boundaries are allegedly mean."
Anyone in USA can subscribe to Judeo-Christian or any other viewpoints and boundaries. The problem arises when a group demands that everyone obey their sense of ultimate propriety. My rights end where yours begin and vice versa. Pretty simple in fact.
"Your self-praising guru throws family values under the bus. "Generations of LGBT Americans, at once ordinary and extraordinary, have made possible this moment in our history," explains the fab cult. Welcome to Changeville!"
So "families" are only those that are Chritian, white, middle-to-upper class and heterosexual? Gays, lesbians, transgender people don't "really' have children and families? Surely you over-reach yourself again. As you've done throughout.
For instance: "In the Christian tradition, you hate the sin but love the sinner. Thus, Christians love ->-bleeped-<-s, but hate their high heels. Obama's Hollywood hates Christianity and Christians. And, assuredly, Islam is a religion of "peace" because Islamists like to kill all ->-bleeped-<-s and burn their high heels."
So all Christians are loving, compassionate and readily distinguish sinners and sins? While all Muslims are stone-cold killers? Read-up on that great "Islamist" bugaboo, Iran. They freely allow transgender people to not only exist, but even pay for their operations. A much more positive take than you are willing to give Muslims of all varieties.
I think it's time that "you people" start to see that your "hype" goes nowhere anymore. You have cried 'wolf', or 'fire' far too often in the past thirty years to be believable anymore. I think you know that. The hysterical edge gets shriller & shriller with every passing day. Um, sounds like rejection to me, resounding rejection one would hope.
Comment by Nichole | July 15, 2008
If he allows it it'll probably become more "the sky is falling" fodder for his brand of "intellectualism." Which I agree with Elwood, and tekla, on.
N~
