Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale

Started by tinkerbell, September 06, 2008, 05:54:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

 Where do you fall on the Kinsey Scale?

0 - Exclusively heterosexual with no homosexual
5 (6.3%)
1- Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
13 (16.3%)
2- Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
15 (18.8%)
3- Equally heterosexual and homosexual
13 (16.3%)
4- Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
7 (8.8%)
5- Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
10 (12.5%)
6- Exclusively homosexual
12 (15%)
X- Asexual
5 (6.3%)

Total Members Voted: 36

Voting closed: September 07, 2009, 04:07:34 PM

tinkerbell

Let's review the scale again:

0 - Exclusively heterosexual experiences with no homosexual
      experiences

1 - Predominantly heterosexual experiences, only incidentally
      homosexual experiences

2 - Predominantly heterosexual experiences, but more than
      incidentally homosexual experiences

3 - Equally heterosexual and homosexual experiences

4 - Predominantly homosexual experiences, but more than incidentally heterosexual experiences

5 - Predominantly homosexual experiences, only incidentally heterosexual experiences

6 - Exclusively homosexual experiences


***************************************************************

Vote and/or post based on your gender identity, not your genetic sex!

***************************************************************

As a reference, this is the link to the Kinsey Institute.

Okay, I will start.  I am a Zero = exclusively heterosexual with no homosexual experiences whatsoever!  :P


tink :icon_chick:
  •  

Elwood

Frack. I voted for homosexual experiences, and then realized you wanted me to vote based on my gender identity...

I've only been kissed by girls, so I guess that would be considered heterosexual... for me, at least. I really get chased by lesbians, though, who think of me as butch. It's hard to define...  :-\
  •  

Nero

Technically a four or five, I've been with way more men than women.
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

tinkerbell

Could you vote again if it isn't too much to ask?  I had to reset the votes because of Elwood!  ;D

tink :icon_chick:
  •  


tinkerbell

Quote from: Nero on September 06, 2008, 06:06:17 PM
yeah. voted 4. few experiences with girls but they weren't incidental.

That sounds about right!  :)

tink :icon_chick:
  •  

Nero

changed to five. really haven't been with enough girls.

Posted on: September 06, 2008, 07:08:30 PM
lol i really need a feminine touch.  ;D
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

Kimberly

Quote from: Tink on September 06, 2008, 06:15:40 PM
Okay, I have modified the poll, and now the users can change their votes!  :P

tink :icon_chick:
Yay for the Tinktress!
  •  

tinkerbell

Okay, I have modified the poll, and now the users can change their votes!  :P

tink :icon_chick:
  •  

Stealthgrrl

  •  

iFindMeHere

Kinsey's scale is so incomplete, though. It assumes static holistic sexuality, when in fact there are people who are inclined one way community-wise, another friendship-wise, another romantically, and another sexually.

Galarza talked about it and i've got the link if you want it.


*hopes Tink doesn't kick my butt*
  •  

deviousxen

Quote from: Nero on September 06, 2008, 06:10:02 PM
changed to five. really haven't been with enough girls.

Posted on: September 06, 2008, 07:08:30 PM
lol i really need a feminine touch.  ;D


Me too... -_- More like any in general.


5. I'm technically lesbian right now I suppose, but a few males have hit on me thinking I was a guy...
  •  

April221

My preference is exclusively for men. Contact with other women was due to the frustration of not being biologically able to properly satisfy a man, so I experimented with women. Not being biologically correct as a woman had some truly disastrous issues result from the intense frustration, so I tried having contact with women. Sexual expression with another woman proved to be impossible because of extreme feelings of guilt, It just felt sooo wrong! Like, women shouldn't do this with other women. Yes, they do, and it's alright for them to do it, but not for me. It just doesn't feel right.
  •  


RebeccaFog

Isn't this poll supposed to be closed?

I'm a 3, I guess. Fits with my cloudy sense of identity.
  •  

Yvonne

Zero.  I can't imagine myself being anything else than a zero!  :-*
  •  

MarySue

Tink, thanks again for the clarification that it's based on gender, not genetic sex.

Given that, I'm a six; I've only been interested in women. I've never even been propositioned by a man. Or if I was, I was too clueless to realize it.  ;)
  •  

tekla

There is so much left out of that, I must be a seven or an eight.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

Adrien

i think the kinsey scale is too... binary for me.
  •  

Christo

I gotta say it again? :laugh: zero. no dudes 4 this dude :laugh: never been w/a dude!
  •