Quote from: Saraloop on October 20, 2008, 07:34:07 AM
Quotebody and mind being coherent and consistent.
it really seems like this is the big thing right? the big struggle.
I may have debated against it, but really, it's a part of what I want to understand.
I wonder how it is that everyone I discuss this to around me, including my mom, seem to be magically immune to this; they'd all be fine with having a body of another gender... it would get some getting used to, but it would not be a big struggle. Is it just this community?? I find that improbable. So you can see where my skepticism comes from.. but that doesn't mean it's less of a struggle for you.. and I never meant to make it sound that way.
I don't believe this. I don't believe people are telling the truth when they say this. I do not believe that many people are
capable of telling the truth about this. I just don't think that people have the frame of reference necessary to be able to say that they'd be fine with having the body of the other sex
because they've never had to live with having a body of the other sex. So, no, they're not magically immune to this. They're magically privileged in not having to ever deal with it, and this gives them a perspective primarily influenced by that privilege.
It's like... I read somewhere that white people would accept $10,000 to turn black, but would require over a million dollars to experience the effects of racism. That is, that people don't really grasp their privilege until it's actually gone.
Anyway, yeah, it's extremely trivializing to claim that one wouldn't actually mind changing sex, that this would cause no problems, that anyone would be happy to switch and wouldn't experience any alienation or dissociation from hir own body. It implies - yet again - that trans people are dysfunctional while cissexual people somehow function "normally" in comparison.
QuoteBut I still want people to consider the possibility that "body and mind being coherent and consistent." is not as important for everyone else; whatever struggles we have lie elsewhere. And I feel that any struggle, of any kind, is a miscalculation by the mind. I see it as any negative feeling is a miscalculation, and any reason, in our mind, for experiencing these negative feelings, is unjustified as well. What use do we have of negative feelings?? - none.. but that's also something that someone could debate with me.. but anyway that's where my statement takes its direction, which Lisa again interpreted as if I was directing it only towards transgendered.. sorry if it came out like that.
This, too is trivializing. I want
you to consider the possibility that "body and mind being coherent and consistent" is not as important for everyone else
because "everyone else" doesn't have to live with an inconsistent body and mind. I also want you to consider that since trans people are forced to grow up in a society and culture that favors the cissexual viewpoint over the transsexual viewpoint, that we have to be
keenly aware of how cissexual people are not only comfortable in their skins in a way that we are not, that they are also frequently unaware of this comfort because they've never experienced its lack. And that they assume that their unawareness of their own comfort in their own skins is something that should be equally experienced by trans people.
I think, by calling what trans people experience a "miscalculation" and "negative feelings," you're making a judgement you shouldn't be about how trans people experience our own lives and bodies. What I did with my body was
right and not a miscalculation. My negativity comes from a society that not only favors cissexual viewpoints over transsexual viewpoints, but from a society that considers transsexual lives to be worth significantly less than cissexual lives. That is, the negativity I experience comes directly from society. So, if you want to talk a miscalculation related to transsexual people, I suggest that transphobia - anti-trans hatred and bigotry - is where you should look.
Not to how transsexual people relate to our own bodies.
QuoteI am listening. I've read every post I and understand more and more.. it's just that some of it I can't relate to...
The belief that you have to relate to it is highly privileged, though. There's a lot of experiences I personally can't relate to, but that doesn't mean I feel entitled to question their validity. I don't feel entitled to claim that if I were in a position to experience something I don't relate to now, that I would experience it in some "better, magically immune way" that implies that the people who do experience it on a daily basis are somehow wrong or "making miscalculations."
Why are you entitled to be able to relate to everything trans people experience?
QuoteQuoteYou make it clear that you're substituting what trans people are saying for your own assumptions.
Maybe I misworded what I meant to say. Because I didn't mean to substitute anything; I was merely trying to explain that I couldn't relate to 'being' like a particular gender and put it in a statement that I considered to make sense,and yes, used my own assumptions to debate.. and I guess I used the word 'logical' again which put the wrong point across.
But you
did substitute something and that something is a common fallacy and prejudice many cissexual people hold about transsexual people - that why we transition is specifically about being free to act in certain ways.
Also: In day-to-day life, do people see you as the gender associated with your assigned sex? If they do, does this bother you?
QuoteQuoteYou're basically denying that trans women have as much diversity in gender expression as cis women do.
So. expressing your true self can come in different forms. I always put more value in expressing my true self through behavior... because expressing myself through body appearance means so little.. for me.. but I guess it does a lot for some.
Here's sort of a viewpoint from a form of my understanding up till now..
... if you associate your true self to a gender, then you'd want to express it with a "gender" as well... and since behavior by itself is not technically gendered, one could only express gender through their body which is clearly either male or female... does that make sense?
You seem to think that a body being a particular sex doesn't involve any action. I want you to consider this: That transsexual people choose our sex by choosing to transition, choosing to take hormones, choosing to seek electrolysis (women, anyway), choosing surgery. That cissexual people choose
their sex by choosing not to undergo any of those procedures. That by simply
having a body with an identifiable sex, that a choice has been made. An action has been taken. For a comparable idea (choosing to live every day by not killing yourself), check out Camus'
The Myth of Sisyphus.
Also, "that behavior itself is not technically gendered" is false. Behavior is gendered in at least two ways - one is that much behavior is gendered stereotypically - liking sports, or working on cars, or guns, or hunting, or fishing, is stereotypically gendered masculine. That this is ingrained in social consciousness. That no human being who has grown up in Western society can realistically claim that sie has not internalized these assumptions about those activities - and the same is true about stereotypically feminine activities. The second way behavior is gendered is who you see doing it. People react differently to women doing something than they do to men doing something. While none of these activities are
inherently gendered as masculine or feminine, we're socialized to gender them. It's just not plausible to discuss behavior without also discussing how behavior is gendered by the participant or any observer.
I would also argue that the assumption that people do not generally associate their true self with a gender is false. While many people may claim it is so, those people typically do not live with the experience of people telling them that their gender is false or invalid. They don't live with people telling them -
society telling them - that they're really not who they think they are. I think you need to question whether people who claim this explicitly identify as men or women. I think you need to question how they see men and women as relating to each other, what marriage means, just how much their expectations of gender are shaped socially and how harshly they judge people who fall outside those socially shaped expectations. Even for those who claim to be attached to a particular gender - how do they feel about being assumed to be a member of the other sex? If a female-bodied person claims to not identify strongly with being a woman, how would this person react to being referred to as a man all the time? Would she actually be okay with that? How would she even know without experiencing it?
Finally, not all transsexual people identify with "man" or "woman" despite still needing to transition from male to female or female to male. For a lot of people, gender identification is a strong part of transition, for a lot of other people, it's not. The need to physically transition is still there.
You keep asserting things about cissexual people on the thinnest threads of justification, and then you give them
greater weight than detailed explanations from transsexual people. Why is that?
Quotebut then,
QuoteThe second assumption you need to abandon is the idea that subconscious sex is gender. It's not. It influences gender (which is why trans women frequently identify as woman and trans men frequently identify as men), but it influences gender for cissexual men and women (which is why they identify as men or women).
I'm sure there's a lot of cissexual people around me, but since I started looking into gender identity, I have not been able to personally find someone who "identifies" with their genderm, or at least, anyone who knew they were. I dunno much about it. That's why I started this topic 
So, What's subcounscious sex ?
Cissexual = a person who feels no need to alter hir physical sex. You're conflating sex and gender again.
Subconscious sex = The sex your brain expects your body to be. Everyone has a subconscious sex, whether it matches their assigned sex or not. If your body is female and you're fine with that, then your subconscious sex is female. If your body is assigned male and you know it should be female, then your subconscious sex is still female. Julia Serano coined the term.
You, for example, misuse gender identity horribly, which is why I would really like for you to dissociate the need to transition physically from the idea of gender roles. "Gender" is a loaded term thanks to feminist and queer theory, leading to all kinds of assumptions about what the word really means when the word "gender" as used in "gender identity" and "gender dysphoria" actually refers to subconscious sex (and thus the need or lack of need to transition).
As I explained above, I don't believe your standards for determining whether cissexual people are actually up to the same standard that you're trying to apply to transsexual people here. It sounds like, basically, they told you that they don't identify with their gender, and you took them at their word. I think that it would take something a bit more intensive and comprehensive to determine whether people identify with any given gender. Especially when talking to people who haven't ever had to deal with challenges to their gender identification as false, deceptive, wrong, or even immoral.
I'm still trying to figure out why it's necessary to identify with something in order to accept its truth.
QuoteMale and female are sexes.
Man and woman are gender roles.
Feminine and masculine are how actions and objects are gendered.
I've seen this used in other combinations too... is this what's official for this community?
Still a bit confused.[/quote]
I've been lurking here for approximately a year, and I never saw any official word. Of course, I'm not a moderator and I only started posting yesterday. I'm speaking for myself, but I do think you really need to make these distinctions if you want to talk about subconscious sex and gender identity and transitioning or not transitioning, or even try to make points about how people do or do not identify with their gender.