Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Androgynes and Cissexual Privilege

Started by Nero, October 18, 2008, 08:18:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lokaeign

Quote from: tekla on December 10, 2008, 10:26:15 AM
If you read academic hiring postings you see the words "Females and other qualified minorities are encouraged to apply" which is academic double speak for "we're not going to hire a white guy, so don't waste your time."

Really.  I thought it was academic speak for "personnel office not staffed by bigots, you might actually have a hope in Hel for once." 

Sorry if I come across as a bit spiky on this topic but when you've been turned down for multiple jobs on the grounds that "this is a male environment, you wouldn't fit in," "women can't use computers," and seen your mates go through similar garbage it's very hard to listen to people telling you how terribly terribly persecuted white men are.
  •  

Constance

Quote from: Lokaeign on December 10, 2008, 05:48:54 PM
Quote from: tekla on December 10, 2008, 10:26:15 AM
If you read academic hiring postings you see the words "Females and other qualified minorities are encouraged to apply" which is academic double speak for "we're not going to hire a white guy, so don't waste your time."

Really.  I thought is was academic speak for "you might actually have a hope in Hel for once."
It does seem to imply that if only certain persons are encouraged to apply, that other persons are discouraged from doing so.

Lokaeign

No, it means that we can pretty much take it as read that white gender-conforming cis males are going to apply anyway, and don't need extra encouragement whereas a woman or a person from a minority group might well have been turned down so many times that they've become utterly disheartened and need the invitation to get them to even try.  I'd like to see signs that mentioned trans folk as well, but this is a start.
  •  

Constance

I didn't say that it meant that white men were discouraged from applying. I guess I should have been more clear in my post.

What I meant was that is seems to imply to me that a person such as myself should not consider applying as I am part of a group that is not being explictly encouraged to apply. To me, that does seem like persons like me are indeed discouraged from applying. But, that's how the subtext appears to me. That doesn't mean that what I perceive as the subtext is the actual intention of the statement. It's just how it seems to me.

tekla

Sure is the way I read it, and - because I pay attention - its the way it comes out.  You can find out who got the job after all.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

RebeccaFog


I just realized that we can be Queerosexuals.

Yes, I know. Get back on topic.
  •