'Nother Gay boy, here. 

The misogyny question is an interesting one.  Personally, I'm quite comfortable among older women, but teen and twenty-something girls, for the most part, annoy the hell out of me. Always have.  I also can't stand super-feminine women of any age.

I'm a straight guy.
Though I can appreciate the male body, I don't want one in my bed beside me. Women are far prettier as far as I'm concerned. 

I don't find women irritating as such, but I can't imagine having a relationship with one. In that context I think they would annoy me, as they would probably be more... emotional?

In the words of Lila from Futurama; "Fry, I'm a woman, and you're a man. We're just too different."


Though as I'm staying a girl physically (for the forseeable future) I'm technically hetrosexual.
Even though, in my mind, I see myself as a gay guy.
'Tis confusing.

Bi-curious in the sense that I am physically attracted to men, but so NOT emotionally. I probably would never date a guy. I would mess around with one, but I don't mess around with people unless I'm dating them, and since I wouldn't date a guy, that kinda contradicts. It makes sense to me.



So realistically I'm straight.

Quote from: freespeechz on January 02, 2009, 12:08:58 PM
Bi-curious in the sense that I am physically attracted to men, but so NOT emotionally. I probably would never date a guy. I would mess around with one, but I don't mess around with people unless I'm dating them, and since I wouldn't date a guy, that kinda contradicts. It makes sense to me.



So realistically I'm straight.

lol, thats about right with me too. Have you ever heard that there around around five different types of attraction?
Sexual, Physical, Emotional, Intellectual and Spiritual. I think I've only ever been attracted to guys in the Intellectual and Sexual sense, never have been emotionally attracted however which is something I would need if I entered into a relationship.

So, what's the difference between physical and sexual attraction?    I'm not trying to be snarky, I just don't understand the distinction.

I guess the difference would be a physical attraction to someone who you don't necessarily want to have sex with. And sexual... that's self explanatory.

Used to consider myself 95% straight, and 5%... unknown. Now it's about 50-50, and that's the influence of testosterone. Strange as it seems, T made me more into guys, and I guess being married to an mtf made me more into penises... but that's another thing entirely (or something... awkward silence...).

I dated a ton of guys before transition (and yes, I'd say it was definitely a TON), but never really felt anything for them. I could get attached emotionally, but the physical attraction was only there with a couple... and funny enough, they were gay and bi. The girls I dated, on the other hand, were somewhat distant emotionally, though the physical attraction was very much there.

I think, if I weren't married, I'd be searching for the near-impossible: a girl with male parts. Is it possible that my perfect woman could have a penis? Well... I married one... but I can't imagine spending my life with a guy. I could have one-night stands with guys. I could play the field with guys. However, when it comes to a soulmate, I think they'd have to be female.

I think, if we had a way of surveying every ftm on earth, we'd probably find an overwhelming number of bisexuals, with the rest split near evenly between gay and straight. But I wouldn't worry about what everyone else is. As Shakespeare said, to thine own self be true.

SD

Quote from: Osiris on January 04, 2009, 12:44:29 AM
I guess the difference would be a physical attraction to someone who you don't necessarily want to have sex with. And sexual... that's self explanatory.

Hmm. This is similar to what I was thinking--but a little different. Could physical attraction have to do with people you think are physically attractIVE but that you are not necessarily attracted TO? I mean, I think Evangeline Lilly is super cute, but, yes, I would definitely kick her out of bed because she's not a boy...

Or maybe I just rephrased the same idea in different language.

another gayer here....

I'm a man's man~.

For about two years I thought I was asexual too, but it never felt right when I tried to explain it to people. "Oh, well, I consider myself asexual, but I'm not opposed to sex in any way, it's just not really my thing, and even though I've never dated anyone, I don't find it repulsive or anything-- just, I have other priorities and haven't really gotten around to it, oh yeah and I can't relate to the community at all and... oh what the hell, none of this makes sense"

...Then last year, I finally realized the whole thing was just repressed transsexuality/homosexuality and everything's been peachy as pie ever since.

Quote from: Arch on January 04, 2009, 03:21:07 PM

Quote from: Osiris on January 04, 2009, 12:44:29 AM
I guess the difference would be a physical attraction to someone who you don't necessarily want to have sex with. And sexual... that's self explanatory.

Hmm. This is similar to what I was thinking--but a little different. Could physical attraction have to do with people you think are physically attractIVE but that you are not necessarily attracted TO? I mean, I think Evangeline Lilly is super cute, but, yes, I would definitely kick her out of bed because she's not a boy...

Or maybe I just rephrased the same idea in different language.

Yeah that about sums it up. There's, like, one or two people of the female persuasion who are easy on my eyes, but it doesn't go any further than that-- I just think they're noteworthy.