Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Thoughts On The Equality Summit's Transgender Breakout Session

Started by Shana A, January 24, 2009, 09:21:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Thoughts On The Equality Summit's Transgender Breakout Session
by: Autumn Sandeen
Sat Jan 24, 2009 at 22:00:00 PM EST

http://pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=9195

Of the hundreds at the Equality Summit, about 8 of us showed up to the transgender breakout. Two of us were media.

What a tough issue this is to the trans subcommunity of the LGBT community. On one hand, many of us recognize exactly how every marriage that a transgender person enters into is considered by many to be a same sex marriage. As Mara Keisling of the National Center for Transgender Equality has pointed out previously:

    Every trans person who's in a relationship, regardless of what their gender is or ever was, they're either in a same-sex relationship or in an opposite sex relationships that somebody could claim was a same-sex relationship.

Some examples of how transsexuals' relationships are all seen as same-sex relationships: a lesbian relationship -- a  heterosexual relationship.  Loving v Virginia's declaration that marriage is a fundamental "basic civil rights of man" seems to not apply uniformly, state to state, for transsexual and transgender people; marriage equality doesn't apply to those whose gender doesn't conform to the two sex-and-gender-always-matches-sex dichotomy.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •