Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

After Being Fired For Anti-Gay Rant, University VP Sues

Started by Natasha, December 04, 2008, 06:20:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

After Being Fired For Anti-Gay Rant, University VP Sues

http://ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=2823&MediaType=1&Category=26
Carlos Santoscoy
12/3/2008

Excerpt: "It's clear that radical homosexuals have an inordinate amount of influence over the University President," Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of The Thomas More Law Center said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. "He openly brags about being friendly to 'lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and questioning individuals'. But he doesn't care about the constitutional free speech rights of Christians."

  •  

Kaelin

If I were to take a comparable contrarian point, I might say that Christians are delusional child-abusers that should either be institutionalized or inprisoned accordingly, and they should pay reparations for all of the crimes committed in their name by surrending their belongs and serving the groups they have violated.  This is essential because the US generally calls itself a Christian nation and, directly and indirectly, has caused the deaths of countless people (hundreds of thousands in Iraq alone) in the name of creating a "democracy" while propping up dictatorships because they serve our self-interests -- and our crimes are worse than by so-called terrorists because our relative wealth means we are better equipped to deal with adversity, and in many cases we have compelled them to behave this way.

Keep in mind that this is not my own viewpoint, but I think it illustrates something comparable to the VP's expression (if not her original statement that got her fired, then her response as included in this article).  And I'm pretty sure that if I was a VP espousing these views, I'd be fired, too.  One could probably stick around as faculty with those views, but high-level management seems to have an obligation to be more diplomatic in their expression, so as to avoid making the school a hostile environment to faculty and students.  An administrator seems to compromise their job when they expresses their views in a way that has an adverse impact on others.
  •  

Jessica M

An administrator should act and speak publicly only along the guidlines of the institution they serve and if they can't they must go :police:

The other option is simply to work for people who express the same views as you.
Imagining the future is a kind of nostalgia - Alaska Young in "Looking for Alaska" (John Green)

I will find a way, or make one!
  •  

Julie Marie

Boy, is she clueless!  She was VP of Human Resources and she publically makes an anti-gay statement and she thinks she shouldn't lose her job?  Huh?  And then her attorney says she has a right to privately express her opinion even though the opinion was published in the newspaper!

Let the spin begin!

Julie
When you judge others, you do not define them, you define yourself.
  •  

tekla

I want to see the original letter.  If she ID herself as University employee, or signed it with her title - then she had it coming.  If she wrote it as a private citizen writing about a political issue, then the Uni is going to be writing, a big assed check, to her.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

Jessica M

Whether or not she expressed the particular view as a university official if she mentioned her position at any point in the interview then the viewpoint she expressed is linked to the university and she must go.
If however the magazine were the ones who mentioned it or it wasn't mentioned at all she has a case. THe fundamental issue may be loss of faith in her to carry out her duties in light of this opinion and if thats the case it's more complicated.
Imagining the future is a kind of nostalgia - Alaska Young in "Looking for Alaska" (John Green)

I will find a way, or make one!
  •