Actually, very little was cut in other programs (several got big increases), and the budget actually increased. The money "saved" from nixing GRS surgery from the provincial health care plan went to help give out government raises. GRS was specifically targeted to be a de-listed service, not because it cost too much money for the province. Even the fiance minister suggested that in her last Q&A speech yesterday.
In terms of the provincial budget, it barely costs anything. It's been deemed to be cut off because it's GRS -- not because of economics or that it's too expensive.
Post Merge: April 09, 2009, 07:47:07 PM
I should also note that Alberta is Canada's richest province, has the lowest employment rate of all of Canada (and indeed, North America).
Provinces that still have GRS funding are B.C. and Ontario (both are having a harder time with the recession, but both can still cover surgery).
Post Merge: April 10, 2009, 04:18:18 AM
Out of the budget (just over 13 Billion),is that $700,000 "saved" is about 0.0019%.
Many feel that the $700,000 projection for the cost of surgeries is also way over-estimated (16 slots are open per year, about 2-3 for FtM and 13-14 for MtF). No matter how anyone has done the math, they still can't figure out who the government claims it's saving $700,000 out of slashing the program. Say, you have 13 girls and 3 guys. We'll say it's $20,000 for the girls, and $80,000 for the guys. The total is $420,000 -- that's a few hundred-thousand short of the "cost saving cut" that they are doing. And about the price to buy a home in Calgary.
But really, the cost comes down to the people it affects. And you really can't put a price on a human life.