I not really liking the idea of anal sex, don't want something in me at all to be honest.

I like giving, but recieving is a def no, no

But I haven't found any girls who are willing to take it.

But it is intresting to hear how the sensation has differed between pre and post T.

Jay

 

QuoteI not really liking the idea of anal sex, don't want something in me at all to be honest.

    I like giving, but recieving is a def no, no

    But I haven't found any girls who are willing to take it.

    But it is intresting to hear how the sensation has differed between pre and post T.

    Jay

Interesting that you'd mention that, Jay.  As I was reading this thread, I was thinking that I would want to try this with my partner, who is also a trans male. ...And then I realized, after quite a while, that there were no penises involved.  I don't know if I like the idea of sex toys, to be entirely honest.  It's strange, because I almost expect myself to have male anatomy!  Sigh 


Accidental

Quote from: Jay on April 06, 2009, 03:00:20 AM
It's strange, because I almost expect myself to have male anatomy!  Sigh.   

I know that feeling too well! 

My partner did once try it with my lil' fella and enjoyed it but wouldn't let me do it that often. If you are going to try it I would recommend getting actual anal toys to ease your self into it (No pun intended) 

Just a general word of caution for anyone thinking of trying out some toys. They have to be specifically designed for anal use, IOW easily retrievable, i.e. with flanges or cords or whatever. Don't use vaginal toys or just any old object unless you fancy a potentially embarrassing trip to your local hospital.

Quote from: Nero on March 31, 2009, 12:43:14 PM
Anal sex for a female body is just a different way of hitting her vagina.
The penis (or object) is hitting the vaginal wall from the other side. The prostate has no monopoly on pleasurable anal sex.

consider this my request for not using this sort of language.  Not all people who possess vaginas are women and not all women possess vaginas.

Quote from: Mister on April 09, 2009, 05:30:31 PM
consider this my request for not using this sort of language.  Not all people who possess vaginas are women and not all women possess vaginas.

whoops. my bad. totally agree as i'm one of the non-woman vagina possessors.

Quote from: Vancha on April 06, 2009, 02:43:15 PM
I don't know if I like the idea of sex toys, to be entirely honest.

There is a cheap alternative: fingers.  I know, I know... but they're pretty good for the task actually.

Quote from: minniemouse on April 06, 2009, 06:27:24 PM
Just a general word of caution for anyone thinking of trying out some toys. They have to be specifically designed for anal use, IOW easily retrievable, i.e. with flanges or cords or whatever. Don't use vaginal toys or just any old object unless you fancy a potentially embarrassing trip to your local hospital.

It's helpful when they are, but it's really not *absolutely* necessary.  I don't know if you've done much actual experimenting back there, but from personal experience it's way harder to get something stuck up there than those warnings lead you to believe, and not nearly as difficult to get something unstuck (not that I've actually gotten anything stuck, but I have... evidence).

consider this my request for not using this sort of language

How did you become the vocabulary police? 

Quote from: tekla on April 09, 2009, 10:03:20 PM
consider this my request for not using this sort of language

How did you become the vocabulary police?

I love you, Tekla. 

Quote from: tekla on April 09, 2009, 10:03:20 PM
consider this my request for not using this sort of language

How did you become the vocabulary police?

Since I've been male and possessed a vagina.

Quote from: Mister on April 09, 2009, 10:48:25 PM
Since I've been male and possessed a vagina.

There are a lot of men on here who possess vaginae who didn't get offended.  There's no reason to take offense if none was intended.

Intent is such a sticky subject though.  Mmm, sticky.

Quote from: Vesper on April 10, 2009, 12:45:30 AM
Mmm, sticky.

ew.  sticky is right up there with moist.

...and considering that it was an ftm who wrote the offensive "her", it's safe to say that there was no offense intended. 

Quote from: Jaimey on April 10, 2009, 12:50:21 AM
ew.  sticky is right up there with moist.

...and considering that it was an ftm who wrote the offensive "her", it's safe to say that there was no offense intended.

Intolerant language shouldn't be tolerated, no matter who said it.  Besides, Nero (who said it) realized his mistake once it was pointed out.  If you weren't offended by it and didn't make the original comment, it doesn't seem to have much to do with you personally... so... why continue this conversation?

Quote from: Jaimey on April 10, 2009, 12:30:58 AM
There's no reason to take offense if none was intended.

I'd like to interject here and mention that, using this logic, anyone should be allowed to say things like "that's so gay" and "you're such a f*g" without repercussions or apology if "no offense was intended."

Many gay people don't get offended at the use of the word "gay" as a derogatory term, but that doesn't mean that those who do get offended should be told to suck it up and get over it.  Same with this.  Mister has a right to get offended by something if that's how he feels.

[/random opinion]

Seriously?  You all need to lighten up.  Like I said, there was no offense meant, so why go to the trouble of taking offense?  And while I wasn't offended by the original comment, making such a huge fuss over a slip up is ridiculous.  You could have just sent Nero a message asking him to change the wording.  Instead, you made this big thing about "request for not using such language".  That's what bothers me about this whole thing.  Someone asks a serious question about anal sex and now we're having this big discussion on whether something is offensive or not.  Why start something that doesn't have anything to do with the original conversation?  Especially bringing up something that was a few pages back? 

I just read this thread tonight, so I was offended by the wording tonight.  I chose to address Nero in the manner that I did, he responded to it without a problem.  I cease to see why you are perpetuating an argument over what you feel is nothing.  Please stop, because you're the one derailing the thread over a one line post.

All I said was that there's no reason to take offense when none was intended.  I'm done arguing though.  If you want to be offended by every little thing, fine, but you're not dragging me down with you.

Quote from: Jaimey on April 10, 2009, 01:13:50 AM
Um, you responded to Tekla, so you are as guilty as I am.  I'm done though.  I'm not arguing with you people anymore.  If you want to be offended by every little thing, fine, but you're not dragging me down with you.

that was at least something that was asked of me, quite unlike your protest to my request for Nero to use non-transphobic language. 

Okay, guys.  Enough now, please.

Back to.. anal sex.