Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

What's with Randi Rhodes and ->-bleeped-<-s?

Started by Shana A, June 26, 2009, 06:46:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

What's with Randi Rhodes and ->-bleeped-<-s?
by bobstandard
Thu Jun 25, 2009 at 02:41:40 PM PDT

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/6/25/746582/-Whats-with-Randi-Rhodes-and-->-bleeped-<-s

I listened to Randi Rhodes's riffs on the Mark Sanford scandal on the radio Wednesday after the press conference. There is plenty of material there for her to work with. The disappearance, the bizzare explanations, the even more  dramatic truth--so far as we know it--the wife's response, the Lt. Governor's response, the local politicians responses, the Republican leadership's responses.  Such a bounty of material! Why Randi thought it appropriate or amusing to question whether Sanford's correspondent is a "trannny" is beyond me. She kept coming back to her idea that Sanford might not be involved with a woman, "it might be a ->-bleeped-<-, who knows?" And then she went on and on about it.

What, you can't make funny with the facts of the story, bizarre as they are? You have to imply even odder issues? You have to venture into the land of calumny and innuendo? That's pretty low.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •