Yet another deluded writer trying to pass off the unmitigated BS that anger/rage/craziness are the sole province of the right.
Pretty much standard issue boilerplate nonsense. Probably out of "left Wing columns for Dummies"
Are Birthers crazy? Oh hell yeah.
pretty much just like the "Bush stole the Election" crowd nine years ago....and plenty of other examples on both ends of the spectrum.
Terry Schivo people...."blood for Oil"....Mena Airport....Bork's America....
Lots of crazies.
Not all on the right.
anyone who wants to rant about, for instance, Michael Savage (whom I LOATH for the record) best spare a moment's thought for Keith Olberman....anyone who wants to mock Ann coulter ought turn a jaded eye on Bill mahr....so forth and so on.
but they don't.
For far too many people the crazies are all on the other side.
That, of course, and people like me who are crazy enough to contradict the popular meme.
Post Merge: September 19, 2009, 03:03:57 PM
Quote from: xsocialworker on September 03, 2009, 11:53:23 PM
The Buck stops here. He needs to ignore FOX Noise and the two faced lyin GOP and ram it through complete with a public option. Faux News speaks only for itself.
Funny that more people watch Fox than watch ALL the other cable news outlets COMBINED, eh?
That's an impressive accomplishment for an outlet no one at all agrees with.
To be sure, it doesn't prove they are right - but it sure proves they resonate with a heck of a lot of people besides just themselves.
Post Merge: September 19, 2009, 04:19:20 PM
Quote from: CindyJames on August 17, 2009, 04:08:40 AM
I know it's not my right to comment, but: (LORD I LOVE THAT LINE IT'S MY CUE
)
I was totally amazed watching FOX USA news about seemingly intelligent people complaining that a "free" health service that would assist the underprivliged was a descent into a socialism and communism. No way to that! it's better to let people suffer than to help them. Sick.
Sorry Heatherrose, I'm going to re-state it: Americans are weird!!
Cindy
Cindy, hun, I say what I say as
one of those poor uninsured folks.
Good intentions don't pay the bills.
Currently we have the wonderfully well-intentioned medicare system which provides generally well recieved services to our elderly (who have paid into the Ponzi scheme all their lives)
Seems like an obvious good deal to pay for the health care of elderly folks, right?
Except that Medicare is going broke - again. After having been "rescued" at the cost of billions some 3 or 4 times before. Current estimates project that by 2030 medicare will consume 1 out of every 4 dollars in federal revenues. By 2050 one out of every two (and Social Security will get the other one, by the way).
either that or the average taxpayer will pay 2/3 of his income to the federal government....just to maintain the current government, not counting adding the new plan
(and that's not counting massive spending currently going to Medicaid - for those really poor people we are worried about - which also can't keep it's financial head above water and which is wrecking the state budgets of many states because the state has to contribute funds in order to "draw down" federal dollars)
And how does Medicare achieve the cost/benefit ratio they have now? By squeezing providers with artifically low price points and restrictions on potential cost-saving innovations.
Those artificially low prices don't mean providers take a loss, they simply increase the cost to all other patients, which increases the cost of insurance, which feeds the cycle of growing health care costs.
Add to that the fact that foreign governments cap the cost of drugs, which means that Americans pay more than there share in terms of development costs and it goes up again.
in fact, almost every factor which increases health care costs in this country is a direct or indirect result of government action.
The point is - it's all well and good to want to "take care of the poor" but the money has to be there. And it's not. It's not there to pay for the obligations we already have, let alone create new ones (and I was saying this while Bush was riding the Drug-Plan pony a few years ago too).
The only way to make sure everyone has coverage is to bring back the FREE MARKET.
I believe, STRONGLY, that the government should insure those who can't afford coverage get care. but that has to come within the context of not screwing up the market so that everyone's costs are as low as practical.
The canard that right wingers are cold-hearted bastards who don't give a damn about the poor is just one more example of what's wrong with the public discourse in this country (and possibly elsewhere) - we can't seem to be content to say "I disagree with your ideas" - everything is reduced to "the other side is teh EEEEEEvil!"
(witness the context of pretty much ANY comment ever made about Dick Cheney)
Those who oppose this plan are not black-hearted monsters who don't care about the poor. Despite the caricature that is often drawn.