http://www.asylum.co.uk/gallery/how-to-spot-a-transvestite/813705/

It's kind of honest...And some-what true but it's also mean---The way it is worded out, Is almost like they want to point out people's flaws---But honest and true at the same time!

the girl in the first picture is not a transvestite but a girl that fully transitioned. Her name is Nong Toom a thai that used to be a thai boxing champion.  A movie named beautiful boxer was made about her life.

They ought to have an article about how to spot an ->-bleeped-<-!

-Sandy
^{cnat spel}

I didn't really care for it either. We are people, human beings with feelings and everything, and that read like a hunting guide. You could easily rename it how to spot <insertanythinghere> then fill the examples with stereotypes from that group. Poor taste.

Quote from: Sandy on August 29, 2009, 06:01:14 AM
They out to have an article about how to spot an ->-bleeped-<-!

-Sandy

Spot on! :]

---

Post Merge: August 29, 2009, 06:19:37 AM

---

Quote from: Becca on August 29, 2009, 06:08:36 AM
I didn't really care for it either. We are people, human beings with feelings and everything, and that read like a hunting guide. You could easily rename it how to spot <insertanythinghere> then fill the examples with stereotypes from that group. Poor taste.

That's the same feeling I had when reading the article! V_V

What a dick... and whoever wrote this shouldn't sound worried about transvestites going after their balls, because with an attitude like that I doubt anybody would want them.
This sounds all a bit homophobic to me.

Quote from: Kamren on August 29, 2009, 06:27:19 AM
What a dick... and whoever wrote this shouldn't sound worried about transvestites going after their balls, because with an attitude like that I doubt anybody would want them.
This sounds all a bit homophobic to me.

At first I thought they were being sarcastic a little bit because some of that stuff is stereotypes and garbage...But I was like hey! The way they are coming off almost sounds homophobic! :\

I didn't care for the article because each and every one of those points can be disproven with an example GG out there. There are GGs with long arms, Adam's Apples, long torsos, etc. I've even met GGs with voices so low that Barry White would go DAMN!!! The one who wrote the article is just a Nazi out to get a couple of quick laughs at the expense of tgirls. I wonder what kind of animal he must be married to.

Since when is it so horrible that someone might not want to flirt with/date/screw a transperson? 

Quote from: Mister on August 29, 2009, 01:20:07 PM
Since when is it so horrible that someone might not want to flirt with/date/screw a transperson? 

Its not that they don't want to have sex with a trans person. That is fine, and a personal choice everyone is entitled to. It is that they were being unreasonably degrading.
It started off not bad, then got nasty with all the quips.
Not cool.

Quote from: Kamren on August 29, 2009, 02:01:53 PM
Its not that they don't want to have sex with a trans person. That is fine, and a personal choice everyone is entitled to. It is that they were being unreasonably degrading.
It started off not bad, then got nasty with all the quips.
Not cool.

I agree.  If it's not your thing, fine by me, but there's no reason to be disrespectful about it.  (A lot of what they said can be true, however.)  If there are straight men who study how to spot a transperson and avoid them like the plague, at least I won't have to go through the song and dance with a douchebag.

Quote from: Mister on August 29, 2009, 01:20:07 PM
Since when is it so horrible that someone might not want to flirt with/date/screw a transperson?

It's not my thing to want to date ->-bleeped-<-s either, but I don't make a website about it.

-Sandy

All women are different in shape arm/leg/torso length, just as guys are. Some are more lanky than others.


However, their #4 about leg length is actually wrong.
Inseam is longer on men percentage-wise, but it is a very small difference. People THINK women have longer legs because of the hips. Hips make women's legs look longer than they are, shoes also contribute to this.


At least they got #1 right, last hope is voice, but sometimes even that isn't enough.
Not that it matters, they can't even discern between transsexuals, transvestites and cross dressers.

Quote from: Leslie Ann on August 29, 2009, 11:39:56 PM
All women are different in shape arm/leg/torso length, just as guys are. Some are more lanky than others.


However, their #4 about leg length is actually wrong.
Inseam is longer on men percentage-wise, but it is a very small difference. People THINK women have longer legs because of the hips. Hips make women's legs look longer than they are, shoes also contribute to this.


At least they got #1 right, last hope is voice, but sometimes even that isn't enough.
Not that it matters, they can't even discern between transsexuals, transvestites and cross dressers.

That's what I said...I was like there is a difference between them! Transvestites and Transgendered/Sexual people are different.

Quote from: Sandy on August 29, 2009, 06:01:14 AM
They ought to have an article about how to spot an ->-bleeped-<-!

-Sandy
^{cnat spel}

The same thought came to my mind  You and I should write one about that 

I fail to see the humor

"How to spot a transvestite -- Funny but also mean! "

Theres plenty of albums in the gallery here where you can not spot the "transvestite".
More like-Ignorant but also mean.

This thread keeps getting more and more annoying for some reason. I want to meet the guy who wrote that and bite him.

Quote from: Audrey on August 30, 2009, 03:46:21 AM
I fail to see the humor

"How to spot a transvestite -- Funny but also mean! "

It's funny not in the fact that the article is funny but the simple fact that half of that stuff is bull! :]

Quote from: heatherrose on August 30, 2009, 04:41:08 AM

I found it difficult to find the "Funny". Luckily, it is a posting from someone
who probably passes gas because they think its funny to cause someone else
discomfort. Unlike a website I read about a short time ago, where I imagine these
pointers would be posted, if the site hadn't been taken down. It was a site that
advocated people posting the picture and any other information, location and
such, of "->-bleeped-<-s" they may have encountered. There was nothing
funny about this site and the intent was quite malicious.

Read my recent post on page 1!