Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

The New York Times Explains One Reason Why A Fully Inclusive ENDA Is Likely Thi

Started by Shana A, August 30, 2009, 12:20:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

The New York Times Explains One Reason Why A Fully Inclusive ENDA Is Likely This Year
by: Autumn Sandeen
Sat Aug 29, 2009 at 23:00:00 PM EDT

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/12729/the-new-york-times-explains-one-reason-why-a-fully-inclusive-enda-is-likely-this-year

From the New York Times' New Impetus for Bill Banning Anti-Gay Bias at Work:

    Momentum is building for Congress to pass the first major civil rights act protecting gays and transsexuals, supporters say, and one of the stars in the debate is a barrier-breaking transgender staffer on Capitol Hill.

    The Employment Non-Discrimination Act, or ENDA, would prohibit workplace discrimination -- including decisions about hiring, firing and wages -- based on sexual orientation or gender identity. It would exempt religious organizations, the military and businesses with less than 15 workers.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

Autumn

For people who don't click links

QuoteThere is another difference from 2007. Frank now has a policy adviser who is a female-to-male transsexual. Diego Sanchez is the first transgender person hired for a senior congressional staff position on Capitol Hill.

Sanchez has done extensive face-to-face lobbying for ENDA, and Frank says that's enabled some members of Congress to get to know a transsexual for the first time.

''He interacts with a lot of people,'' Frank said. ''Prejudice is literally ignorance.''
  •  

LordKAT

Inclusive with exceptions. I understand religions, but not small businesses nor the military.
  •