Hm...I seem to have a sixth sense for this, but I always fall for lesbians, even when they're not 'overtly' lesbian.  I just have a thing for independent women who couldn't care less about me, I guess.  Also, brunettes or redheads, that's the only other part of my 'type'.  Same requirement for guys (although they don't have to be lesbians )  I would date transmen or transwomen, pre- and post-op.

I'm attracted to men.  But there have been a few instances where I sort of had a crush on a girl.  It was more confusing than anything, and I'm not sure I could be with a woman.  But maybe I'll try it out someday after I'm done messing with these menfolk, lol.

I suppose I forgot to say whether I'd date ftm, and the answer is sure.  While I prefer boy bits, I can work with girl bits on a man.  I doubt, however, that I would ever be attracted to a transguy who hadn't been on T for several months at least.

Excuse me crashing this FtM thread but... I like girls!

Femme girls, and thats it.

Jay

My favorite type is the "hot librarian" 

Quote from: Alex_C on September 15, 2009, 12:15:45 PM
My favorite type is the "hot librarian" 

Ha.  My lady's a librarian. 

Chubby guys with beards and long hair! haha ok they don't have to be chubby and have long hair but facial hair is a must.

I also like 'butch' women, but some femme girls look good too. And I like androgynes

yay for being pansexual

Mister - Dang, you're smooth.

Quote from: Alex_C on September 15, 2009, 12:36:08 PM
Mister - Dang, you're smooth.

hahaha, thx dude.

Preferably someone more feminine than me. My tastes seem to be shifting towards women. As for the transsexuals, I guess it depends.

SilverFang

Yeah that says it best silverfang. Someone more feminine than me.

I like effeminate/androgynous skinny guys without a ton of body hair and... I guess really femme girls. I dunno. I'm not so much into women as I am to men.

Well Im bisexual but I love the ladies. Personality always comes first though.

I'm primarily attracted to women, but I'm a "never say never" kinda guy. I've been with guys in the past when I was living as a girl (and was married to one, had kids with him, etc), but I left that life so that I could be myself (at that time, I identified as a lesbian, but realized later that was a "baby step" towards becoming the real me - the male me) and be with people of the gender I'm most attracted to.

That being said, I've always had a teensy tiny little bit of attraction towards some men, some of the time. And now that I'm living (at least part time as far as other people are concerned - but full time in my mind) as a guy, I'm less "put off" by the idea of being with guys, although I'll probably not act upon that still.

Add to that the fact that my partner is a female-bodied, androgynous gender-queer (Self-identified as closer to the male end of the spectrum. Would rather be gender-neutral, but likes being sir'd and hates being maam'd.). I think I hit the jackpot with my sweetie, cuz I really love that sie is able to be fluid with hir gender expression, and I can also be somewhat fluid with my orientation, while still being with a female-bodied person (as this is what I'm more attracted to than male bodies, although not exclusively).

I do find many FTMs and MTFs to be attractive, and I wouldn't have a problem if they were pre- or post-op. I find some bio-guys to be attractive, but could only be with them if they truly saw me as a guy. I find bio-gals attractive (obviously) but find queer chicks to be hotter than straight chicks (to my eyes at least).

I'm kinda confusing that way I guess. lol

relationship wise or sex wise?

Quote from: Nero on September 17, 2009, 05:03:22 PM
relationship wise or sex wise?

Personally, relationship wise and sex wise mean the same thing - to me. Others may feel differently, only speaking for myself.

But for me, I can't be in a relationship with someone that I'm not sexually attracted to, and I personally don't prefer having sex with someone that I'm not at least somewhat romantically attracted to as well. So the line blurs, and is often completely non-existent.

Except when it comes to Angelina Jolie or Keira Knightly (or both together, that would be wicked  ), I wouldn't want a relationship with either of them, but *damn* would I like a chance to get in their drawers...

{ahem}

Sorry, that was my inside voice, usually I'm much more respectful than that.

I prefer guys with strong arms, a bit of baby fat and more facial hair than chest hair, who are right between egghead and jock on the continuum, and hopefully not more than 6" taller than my 5'2" (my partner is exactly 1' taller  ). Then there's the personal qualities: sensitive, caring, adoring, open-minded, non-sexist/racist and good at making me laugh.  Make me laugh and I'll fall for ya. Also, I don't like 'rocks' nor chattermouths, too little talking and too much both turn me off. 


I'm not really into the ladies, so MtF are out, but FtM dudes are fair game.  I guess I like most guys who aren't uber jocks or more than a little femme-y. Since I'm not passing full-time, straight men are ok, but gay/bi guys who aren't too queen-y are at the top of my list. My guy isn't gay or bi but I wish he were cos it would make him feel much less weird about kissing a "wannabe-guy." 

Quote from: NES_junkie_James on September 17, 2009, 05:11:40 PM
Personally, relationship wise and sex wise mean the same thing - to me. Others may feel differently, only speaking for myself.

But for me, I can't be in a relationship with someone that I'm not sexually attracted to, and I personally don't prefer having sex with someone that I'm not at least somewhat romantically attracted to as well. So the line blurs, and is often completely non-existent.
...

This. I wouldn't want to get into a serious relationship with anyone who I couldn't imagine getting intimate with, simply because I'd hate to be in the situation of "I like you as a boyfriend but not enough to do THAT.." A guy has to be a good friend to me before he can become a serious boyfriend. No base of friendship = little more than a temporary infatuation.

Quote from: NES_junkie_James on September 17, 2009, 05:11:40 PM
Personally, relationship wise and sex wise mean the same thing - to me. Others may feel differently, only speaking for myself.

But for me, I can't be in a relationship with someone that I'm not sexually attracted to, and I personally don't prefer having sex with someone that I'm not at least somewhat romantically attracted to as well. So the line blurs, and is often completely non-existent.

Except when it comes to Angelina Jolie or Keira Knightly (or both together, that would be wicked  ), I wouldn't want a relationship with either of them, but *damn* would I like a chance to get in their drawers...

{ahem}

Sorry, that was my inside voice, usually I'm much more respectful than that.

Well, for me, there's a whole lot of people I would want to be with sexually but very few that are relationship material. For instance, I'm still attracted to guys but I really don't want a relationship with another male at this point. 

Anyway, far as girls I prefer brunettes with some kind of a shape. Especially in the back department.

Guys have to be about 5'7 and under to even get a second glance, and 5'3 is preferable. Either skinny or chubby. No muscle whatsoever. And brunette as well. I'm not picky.