Quote from: tekla on February 02, 2010, 09:27:25 PM
Correlation is not causation
I don't think anyone is arguing for a causal relation (dyslexia causes androgyn... icity, or the other way around). Nevertheless, I am inclined to agree that this data counts for very little. What we seem to be dealing with is a confirmation bias: where the ones who don't have dyslexia simply aren't replying, and we remember cases that may fit with this theory as opposed to those that don't.
I'm only toying with the idea of being an androgyne at present, but for example:
I am (running under the assumption that I might be) an androgyne;
I am not dyslexic. Therefore, not all (potential) androgynes are dyslexic.
"Ah," you might say, "but there's only one of you. Compare that to the twenty-something of us!"
But the proportion among the twenty-something (plus me) of us says nothing about the proportion in the larger group outside of us. The sample size is entirely too small to draw any meaningful conclusion, and we should resist the temptation to do so.
</scientific explanation>
Yeah... Anyway... I'm not dyslexic, and I'm at least transgendered (umbrella term that it is), so there's a bit of dissenting opinion for you.