Is cross-dressing in fatigues next?
Posted: February 09, 2010
1:00 am Eastern
Mychal Massie
© 2010

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=124483

Why is it so important to Obama to have homosexuals openly identified as such in the armed forces? Sexual orientation is a basic foundation of compatibility in battle. This is not a small issue. It will literally destroy the integrity of combat units, whether they be in the field, onboard ships, in airplane cockpits or in submarines.

Other than cross dressing in the headline, no other of mention of transgender in the article. Still, the implication that gays somehow lead to transgender...

QuoteBut even Clinton stopped short of advancing the celebration of a homosexual military.

Celebration? As in only gays? Not likely. Nor have I heard of anyone "having" to state their orientation, just not having to deny it. Nor do I believe it will

Quotedeconstruct

the military.



I wish I had better words to refute these articles.

Massie is a fool. He does do some good, but he's .... ah. *Shrug.*

http://www.google.com/search?q="mychal+massie"

RWW article about him: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/individuals/mychal-massie

He's also the chairman of Project 21.