I understand a lot of legislation has been enacted as of late citing a vague wage gap, but I am unsure where to find it. I just can't find any jobs where women are paid one wage and men another for identical work.
Now, I understand their net incomes are different, but then that is because of fewer hours worked, different majors, and numerous other factors unrelated to a vague patriarchal organizations bent on some emotional, irrational war on womankind.
I'm so confused. 
Sources:
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba392/
http://www.swifteconomics.com/2009/09/21/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics-the-wage-gap/
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HSP/is_1_4/ai_66678566/
http://sanantonio.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/stories/1999/05/03/editorial2.html

http://www.aauw.org/about/newsroom//pressreleases/042307_PayGap.cfm
http://www.ala-apa.org/newsletter/vol4no06/PDFs/salaries.pdf
http://www.feministing.com/archives/006916.html

Women paid less, just one year out of college, with the same qualification.

Is this due to hours worked?
Overtime pay would have a lot to do with that.
Willingness to relocate?
Oftentimes men are more willing to sacrifice quality of life for money.
Workplace conditions?
See above.
Warren Farrell, former chairman of NOW, claims that with all of these things considered, women actually make more than men because of anti-discriminatory legislation.

Quote from: UseU on April 06, 2010, 11:15:11 PM
Is this due to hours worked?
Overtime pay would have a lot to do with that.
Willingness to relocate?
Oftentimes men are more willing to sacrifice quality of life for money.
Workplace conditions?
See above.
Warren Farrell, former chairman of NOW, claims that with all of these things considered, women actually make more than men because of anti-discriminatory legislation.

It's due to women having lower pay expectations than men, due to being consistently underpaid throughout the last century.

Quote from: casorce on April 06, 2010, 11:17:23 PM
It's due to women having lower pay expectations than men, due to being consistently underpaid throughout the last century.

Then why not staff a company with all women? With that pay gap, I'd run my competitors into the ground!

Quote from: UseU on April 06, 2010, 11:24:37 PM
Then why not staff a company with all women? With that pay gap, I'd run my competitors into the ground!

How about women in third world countries?
Oh wait...been done.

Quote from: UseU on April 06, 2010, 11:24:37 PM
Then why not staff a company with all women? With that pay gap, I'd run my competitors into the ground!

Your profits would be insanely high since you could underpay your entire staff.

Quote from: Autumn on April 07, 2010, 12:08:25 AM
Your profits would be insanely high since you could underpay your entire staff.

So why wouldn't a soulless, profit-driven organization hire all women then? I mean, the patriarchy can have their little clubhouse or treehouse or wherever they headquarter their war against the female sex, all I want is money!
I'll bet their dues are outrageous, too.

Because once discovered, who the hell would want to work for you?

Quote from: UseU on April 07, 2010, 12:41:43 AM
So why wouldn't a soulless, profit-driven organization hire all women then? I mean, the patriarchy can have their little clubhouse or treehouse or wherever they headquarter their war against the female sex, all I want is money!
I'll bet their dues are outrageous, too.

Never noticed any small business type cleaning agencies?

Quote from: LordKAT on April 07, 2010, 12:47:50 AM
Because once discovered, who the hell would want to work for you?

Women! I'm not a member of the patriarchy, so I couldn't care less about harassment or workplace negativity. No, the oppressive men would be out of the picture, so I'd pay people what they'd take and rack in the profits.

I'd pay people what they'd take and rack in the profits

Don't we call this capitalism?  And in the last few years there have been bidding wars taking some jobs as much as 25%30% lower wages that were paid to person holding it before.

Tragically though, it often takes good people, and you do have to pay them.

Quote from: UseU on April 07, 2010, 12:41:43 AM
So why wouldn't a soulless, profit-driven organization hire all women then? I mean, the patriarchy can have their little clubhouse or treehouse or wherever they headquarter their war against the female sex, all I want is money!
I'll bet their dues are outrageous, too.

They do; hence my mentioning of third world sweat shops, filled with desperate Korean women working for 10 cents a day.

Quote from: UseU on April 06, 2010, 11:24:37 PM
Then why not staff a company with all women? With that pay gap, I'd run my competitors into the ground!

You have the freedom to start your own company and the responsibility to do so if you can do better.

---

Post Merge: April 08, 2010, 02:05:22 PM

---

QuoteThey do; hence my mentioning of third world sweat shops, filled with desperate Korean women working for 10 cents a day.

Just think if their mother's never had sex they would not be in that position.

Quote from: lisagurl on April 08, 2010, 02:01:12 PM
Just think if their mother's never had sex they would not be in that position.

What?

Wow Lisa...thas harsh.

It takes more brains and drive (not to mention interpersonal skills) to start and run a successful company than is demonstrated here.