Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Ignorance is no excuse when it comes to discrimination, harassment

Started by LostInTime, October 23, 2006, 01:11:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LostInTime

HR Article Link

+ Transsexuality now covered: In August 2006, Westchester County Judge Lefkowitz held that the New York state Human Rights Law covers transsexuality, not only gender. Hence, co-workers' "teasing" comments about Jerry's transsexual status may be illegal harassment.


+ Broader definition of retaliation: This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court defined prohibited employer retaliation as any "materially adverse" employment action that "might have dissuaded a reasonable worker" from complaining about discrimination or harassment. Thus, employer liability for retaliation may result from action far short of actual firing -- an unfavorable evaluation, an unwelcome schedule change, or even, as happened to Jerry, unwanted reassignment which resulted in a burden, financial or otherwise, to the employee.


Do not find yourself in the extremely costly shoes which FedEx Ground wore this summer. In June 2006, a California jury awarded two employees of Lebanese national origin $61 million. The proven allegations? FedEx Ground had failed to train its staff on discrimination and allowed a manager to taunt the two employees as "sand jockeys" and "terrorists." How to avoid this predicament? Train, train, train.
  •