Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Current ENDA Language Regarding Transgender Workers Revealed, Concerns Mount

Started by Shana A, May 06, 2010, 11:22:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Tuesday, May 04, 2010
Current ENDA Language Regarding Transgender Workers Revealed, Concerns Mount
Posted by Rebecca Juro at 10:07 AM   

http://transgroupblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/current-enda-language-regarding.html

During his show Sunday night, TransFM founder and host Ethan St. Pierre received a call-in from International Foundation for Gender Education (IFGE) Executive Director Denise LeClair, who revealed for the first time what the current language regarding transgender workers and bathroom usage currently being considered by the Congress may mean in a practical, everyday sense.

Among the key points:

* Employers will not be permitted to force a transgender employee to use a bathroom that is opposite of their gender identity, but they also will not be obligated to allow that employee to use the bathroom that corresponds to their gender identity, as long as (currently undefined) reasonable accommodations are made. In other words, employers will be allowed to segregate transgender employees and create the modern equivalent of "Whites Only" and "Negro" bathroom facilities specifically intended to exclude Transgender-Americans from the rest of the workforce.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

LordKAT

Lesser of two evils, I would rather be segregated than unemployed. I would rather be stealth than segregated.
  •  

Jasmine.m

I agree with Kat... The time for debating language changes has long since passed. It's time to move this legislation forward! Future adjustments can't be made without it's initial passage!!
  •