Well actually the GRC allowing us to get a new BC does allow older MtFs to retire early and get pension earlier but actually the BC does bring up an as yet untested legal isssue:
Many of us who get the GRC and BC but still haven't had surgery are actually not in need of sexchange surgery! But instead we are in need of surgery to rectify a 'congenital intersex condition!
Exactly the same surgery but if the Gov't has given BCs that state Female at birth but we still have male bits then obviously and legally we must be congenitally intersexed.
One MtF is going to use this argument in court very soon.
Post Merge: August 03, 2010, 02:52:16 AM
Quote from: Lewis on August 03, 2010, 02:10:36 AM
I'm under the impression that you can't get the gender marker changed on your passport without the GRC. Although I do know someone who managed to blag it without having one.
Just looked at my passport and I got it well before my GRC and BC and it does state Female.
Post Merge: August 03, 2010, 03:58:49 AM
Those transitioners living in a UK area where SRS is restricted can transition the full two years and get the GRC and BC and then use the congenitally intersexed point to force their NHS to get them surgery.
The NHS won't have a leg to stand on as to say they won't provide surgery will mean they are in breach of Human Rights laws as logically if a person has a BC stating female but has male bits (or vice versa) then obviously they cannot live a proper life like all other people whose BCs say F (or M) and surgery must be provided to allow this.
My advice to anyone living in an area where the NHS is trying to restrict SRS is to get the GRC and BC as soon as possible.