This is HUGE. It's a double-bitch slap. Because the ruling said the law was wrong on not one, but two different parts of the Constitution. One, it violated 'due process' and second it violated 'equal protection under the law.' That means the opponents now have to prepare not one, but TWO briefs, explaining the the appeals process how the judge was 'wrong on the facts, wrong on the law' on not one, but TWO, different and seperate areas. Meaning, even if they would win on one point, but lose on the other, the ruling stands.
And I really, really, doubt the SC is going to take it up.
And, oh yeah, just for the win, the judge that wrote this. Some 'activist liberal judge' - nope, a Ronald Reagan appointee. Suck on it Xians.