Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Context: Let's Talk About "->-bleeped-<-"

Started by Natasha, December 30, 2010, 08:44:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

Context: Let's Talk About "->-bleeped-<-"

http://www.bilerico.com/2010/12/context_lets_talk_about_->-bleeped-<-.php
12/30/10

Context plays a big role, but as with any slur, the personal experience someone has as the target of the slur is a part of that context - and it makes a big difference. Part of why I say it would be fine to have had Stryker's film be titled "Screaming ->-bleeped-<-s" is because it's a documentary examining transphobia and trans people's activism created by a trans woman who's significantly connected to trans community and regularly challenges trans misogyny. The context makes sense. Whereas when Michelangelo Signorile, a cis gay man, goes on tv and tells everyone that ->-bleeped-<- isn't a slur and he knows 'cause he's a big homo, and "has some friends" who use the term (why didn't they invite those friends on the show?) the context is pretty clearly insulting.

  •