Quote from: Axélle-Michélle on April 17, 2012, 11:15:24 AM
I read what you say and I wonder...
From 2.5" to 7" depth, just like that... and you do not mention how exactly this was achieved.
BTW, as it would be understood 7", AND with a shortage of donor material spells colovaginoplasty.
A VERY much different protocol from a so far mentioned inversion... right?
To achieve 7" -with inversion protocol- is yet another thing all together.
It does require to penetrate into the peritoneal cavity, by-passing the peritoneal reflection, going along the sigmoid-colon path, as of course is unavoidably in the case with colon-section (colovaginoplasty).
It is all but an option with inversion and this only with a few SRS surgeon, to cut into the abdominal cavity - just to have more depth... and BTW much more then your average biological AFAB female.
Lastly, the comment of where the clitoral hood would then have come from, is only addressed by saying "...I think it looks great".
BTW, I do not doubt that it does look great, just to make quite sure.
You may appreciate though, that the information content on this reply is not really answering the previous post's points raised. Neither did it settle my curiosity how this apparent miracle (2.5" – 7") came about.
Hum...
Axélle
Well, you have lots of information...I have a set of dilators. I also have an intact colon. So...
The 'miracle' is just the difference in whatever it is Suporn does. Sure, if I had more material, maybe I would have gone to a different surgeon. I looked at Kamol, Saran, Preecha and Chettawutt. I'm not going to attack other surgeons. I'm sure they've all done fine work, and sure, they are cheaper. I'm just telling you that I dilate to 7 inches, without a colon operation, and without skin grafts from anywhere outside of my groin. I know Suporn uses all of the scrotal skin, where not all surgeons do, but then, this was about the accuracy of your critique of Suporn, not others. Perhaps that's the difference. Suporn doesn't use penile skin for the vaginal wall; but instead, for the labia. It's possible he uses skin from the crease in the groin, but I don't know for sure. Sure a combined inversion plus graft would have given more depth, but I can tell you that Preecha said the only way he could give me 5 inches was with a colon segment. What else is there to say? What are you trying to say?
You made a point of comparing to genetic females on depth. Well, fair enough, but again, that's not what I posted about. I just said that your information was incorrect and that I had both a good depth and good cosmetic appearance with little donor material. I actually said to Dr Suporn that anything approaching 6 inches would be great, but in hospital I started with 6.75, which at least for now, I've managed to increase to 7 with committed dilation. As for the comparison, the penile inversion technique is less comparable with genetic females in terms of accuracy anyway...but again, that's neither here nor there. It wasn't the point.
Appearance is a subjective thing...and some people end up with better results than others. I'm saying that the result I have looks very good, and I'm happy with it. I don't know how he managed it, he just did.
You made a comment based on second hand information, I disagreed using my own experience. What's the problem?