If the judge will take the first case involving gender differences and declare, as binding state legal precedent, that they are indeed within the purview of the ordinance's sexual orientation language, then I for one will not be too proud to accept his findings in favor of transgendered people. That is what happened here in California, where our State Supreme Court declared that gender differences were included in legal protections that covered sexual orientation. I am just as happy with getting it in that way as any other. We have it, its ours.
