According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006
Started by drvotion86, May 04, 2011, 09:46:43 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: drvotion86 on May 04, 2011, 02:05:23 PMthx i live in lubbock 175 isnt bad, there were a bunch of promotions she was telling me.
Quote from: drvotion86 on May 04, 2011, 08:07:03 PMOh so good news i went to victoria secret and got measured, I am 36A =P
Quote from: Jameve on May 06, 2011, 09:40:28 PMHave you girls considered electrolysis? Laser isn't proven to be permanent and isn't FDA approved as permanent hair removal so electrolysis seems like the natural choice to me. Why the laser route? Just wondering- maybe there's something I don't know. I'm not trying to dissuade anyone.
Quote from: EmmaM on May 06, 2011, 10:57:20 PMElectrolysis = $ 63 / hr x 112 hrs = $7056 dollars, and a two year long process.laser (esp. if you're on HRT) is much faster, less than half the cost, and guaranteed to work nowadays. If you don't see permanent reduction they typically re-zap you for free... every tech I've spoken to has told me that laser now kills the follicles just as electrolysis does.edit: the trans woman who runs my clinic waited until she was 6 months into HRT, she told me she had hers done 4 years ago and only went through 5 sessions- she's smooth as a baby.