IMO that should still count as employment discrimination... They shouldn't be allowed to discriminate based on negative, prejudiced assumptions.
Discrimination, at least on a legal basis, is a matter of class and not individuals. You have to have a situation where an entire groups of people are discriminated against as a matter of policy. And any - and every - employer these days has a huge amount of people to choose from which makes it hard for anyone to prove discrimination. It way too easy to find someone/anyone, who 'would be a better fit for our company'.
And long, long before anyone really had a chance to see you to discriminate on the basis of your looks - and don't kid yourself, image is important, and in many jobs critical - the fact that you have zero work history would be a resume killer all by itself. I myself would not read past that point as I don't need to try to supervise people who not even aware of what it is to be an 'employee' in this day and age. Nor would it be fair to the people who trust me to make those decisions, who expect me to choose people based on what would be best for the company.
Strictly speaking, just for myself, as a working supervisor, I really don't have the time to supervise, I'd rather be getting my real work done. So I bring on people who don't need any supervision at all. People who know what the work requires and have proven their ability to meet those demands over a rather long period of time. When I'm on the deck with my crew (usually 4 others) we have over 150 years of combined experience doing rock concerts. And that means that I don't have to worry about them. They are proven commodity.