Quote from: tekla on July 03, 2011, 09:35:56 AMSecond, time, after time, after time, it's been proven that student ratings of professors are directly tied to the grades. So the whole deal tends to slide downward.
I find this very interesting because both RMP (last time I looked, which was years ago) and my uni (not to mention other unis) claim, time after time, almost the opposite. I have done my own anecdotal investigation into some of my colleagues who are KNOWN grade inflators. They get consistently high reviews and positive comments. It's possible to maintain a reasonable standard and still get high reviews, but (in my experience), those reviews are not as high as the ratings given to the profs who I KNOW award higher grades.
It's also possible that some of the folks who award higher grades are just better teachers with a genuine gift, but this clearly isn't consistently true. I've seen some of the essays that a couple of my much-loved, highly rated colleagues give passing grades to. With one guy, the essays shouldn't even have gotten Cs, but he was giving them Bs. Oookay.
On the positive side, I was telling one of the assistant directors that in official evals every quarter, a few students complain that I grade too hard, and my ratings fall as a result. She said, "Actually, that's good. The director wants that. In fact, if you don't get a few of those from time to time, you go down the rankings every year and are less likely to be rehired." Of course, I still have to reapply every year; a few instructors with a limited version of tenure are known grade inflators, as I mentioned. I don't know what's being done about them, but the director seems to want things to change; he lectured about grade inflation at the last meeting, and the assistant director seems to think that something will happen in the near future. We'll see what happens.