Quote from: kate durcal on July 18, 2011, 07:59:12 PM
That is why I voice so strong against those threads that perpetuate the negative sterotypes, like prostitution is OK, she-males are Ok, dressing like a slut is OK, etc. All of this is pushing me to thing that perhapps the proponents of separating TS from non-TS in GID may be right.
Kate D
I say this with great respect for you Kate, but that is really just dealing with something through ignorance.
The issue here is the image, which we fear, the public might take as being representitive of all of us.
The reality is, these TV programs are made by producers who are seeking to make a point. They select those who they best feel will make that point.
Last year, there was a link to a posting in Yahoo, where someone described how to 'Tell if the Chick you're with is Transgender or not'. There isn't any need to go into the details, since I'm sure we've heard them all before.
But if we insist that we are only concerned with active transision, for example, then we immediatly create a necessity to prove something for admission. That will be a tremendous mistake. Those that pass really well, will simply deny what they started with. Those that retain any evidence, be it physical or even simply history, will mark themselves as targets.
By concentrating upon self expression, who we each are becomes irrelevant. But that means that we must accept the cross dressing prostitute as much as we accept those who have very successfully transioned.
If we need to make moral judgements, then it should be about prostitution, not how people are dressed.
Frankly, I see no reason why anyone should not be free to wear a pink frock with muscualr arms and a beard. Any more than someone should not wear jeans and a sweat shirt with breasts and feminine hips.