Frankly, if the best the nay-sayers can come up with is Charles Kane, then the question arises, why is there an apparent discussion at all?
I can only assume that the press types, along with most intelegent people, have no problem with how others live their own lives but remain somewhat fearful of the more vociferous social screamers.
Though, given the obvious social and personal meantal health issues of Mr. Kane, it does seem somewhat questionable that this sad man should be continually wheeled out to be publically humiliated in this way.