Quote from: Emily Ray on October 20, 2011, 09:38:57 PM
I am being treated in the addiction medicine clinic. I don't know what would happen if I was in the mood clinic it might be different.
I know that I don't have borderline personality according to past providers. I only have one symptom of nine according to the DSM-IV and that is suicidality. But, mine is under control because I ask for help when ever I start feeling out of control. I agree that I have depression. But the diagnosis of BPD just isn't appropriate for me.
I have been told that the Program in Human Sexuality at the U of Minnesota uses the MMPI-2 with all clients.
I requested that I be tested using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM and it was denied because I tested normal on the MMPI-2. The psychologist who gave me the test didn't support the BPD diagnosis, but the psychiatrists think they are smarter than everyone else.
Huggs
Emily
Any competent professional doesn't use objective assessments to make any diagnosis, let along suggest comorbid diagnoses, I can assure you that much (key word being competent). It's people who use assessments improperly and treat people with diagnoses they aren't specialized in that give all of us clinical psychologists a bad name.
The MMPI-2 gives information as to what types of people test similarly, but
NOT to suggest that, for instance, MTF individuals are borderline. Any "professional" making that assumption is not going to help you and you should find a new provider! The reason the MMPI-2 provides information as to what individuals test similarly is to direct the provider to rule out one or the other, NOT to suggest dual-diagnosis. For example, a lot of symptoms of depression are similar to symptoms of mania; it all depends on the person. Professionals need to know when assessments will fail at differentiating between similar symptomology in order to avoid inappropriate treatment; in this case, giving anti-depressants to someone with mania.
PHS at UMN uses the MMPI-2 as an efficient way to gather general information about a client; it's just how things happen in the present-day reality of managed care. My advisor did his post-doc at PHS and I've got a fair amount of experience with PHS, and really the MMPI-2 and similar assessments are used as a way to save patients $. It helps a provider put their radar up for potential depression, anxiety, personality issues, and things of the like, so they know what is and isn't appropriate for a particular client. Any competent professional uses that information as
informational only, and then goes on to create an
individualized treatment plan.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of really awful standards and practices put in place by corporations and insurance providers. Programs like PHS have the unfortunate task of being the medium between their patients and the awful "system." It's very tempting to blame the provider or the program (not saying you're doing this), but the patient always has the right to question practices and seek a second opinion, and should see those rights as responsibilities in their own treatment. If somebody comes to me with a problem that I don't specialize in, of course I want to help them, but I can only do so much if it's not my specialty. I can't kick a patient to the curb if they won't heed my advice to find a different, more specialty-competent provider.
EDIT: I'm not necessarily advocating for PHS or the MMPI-2, here, I'm just pointing out their rationale.
And to Michelle:
It depends on how much you trust your current provider. You could ask your current provider, but if you're already dissatisfied, you may have to do the legwork yourself.