Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Santorum, not knowing the facts or lying?

Started by annette, February 27, 2012, 12:40:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cradle_o

Quote from: Jamie D on March 01, 2012, 03:51:53 PM
You're a natural born comedian.  ;D

Two words: Goldman Sachs
So, two words (with no comment) obviates the actual fact of the grassroots support, does it? Maybe we can compare facts on this.
which should include that the support from Wall Street for this administration is vanishing. I wonder why.  ::)
  •  

cradle_o

Now we have seen Frothy Mix o' assert that one simply cannot study US History in '7 or 8' of the U. of Callifornia schools.

he makes ->-bleeped-<- up. it just doesn't matter. The fanatics that go for this are righteous and invincible, everything they do is right, no worries, no questions...
  •  

tekla

Best of all, the one place that has no US history courses is the University of California San Francisco - which of course, knowing what left-wing America hating types we are only makes sense that we wouldn't have US history courses at our UC, no way - Except that UCSF is a medical school and teaching hospital, and a medical school and teaching hospital only.  The only courses they offer are advanced medical courses.

There are 23 California State Universities, all of which have history course, and, as noted, 7 out of 8 of the Universities of California offer history courses, the exception being the medical school.

So, again, he's lying.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

Rubberneck

Its obvious to any geniune person that Santorum is an genuine guy. That romney and gingrich are not.
  •  

tekla

We don't elect the President to be 'authentic', we elect them to administrate.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

justmeinoz

Some of these people make our Bob Katter sound almost sane.  Almost.

Karen.

"Don't ask me, it was on fire when I lay down on it"
  •  

tekla

Oh I don't think he's really even gone off his deep end yet, but it's coming.  What is pretty trippy is that by virtue of running the race he has, once Mitt gets his butt handed to him in the general, that the 'Pubs will start screaming that "we didn't run someone who was a real conservative (i.e. think Handmaiden's Tale), and that's why we lost," and old Rick will be the de facto front runner for 2016 Republican nomination.  Though they still long in their hearts, souls, loins and wet dreams for St. Sara to run, but she's too busy being Oprah these days to worry about any sort of 'change' that isn't money in her pocket first.


Re: Bob Katter (pulled from Wiki)
- During their 1964 Australian tour, The Beatles were pelted by eggs from some unknown assailants. Katter, then a university student, later came forward and admitted his involvement, in what he explained was an "intellectual reaction against Beatlemania."  (Because throwing eggs is the highest level of intellectual discourse in Australia?)
- He is critical of climate change and has been an opponent against enacting legislation to control emissions.
- In November 1989, Katter claimed there were almost no homosexuals in North Queensland.
-  Katter described critics of Burgess as "little slanty-eyed idealogues who persecute ordinary average Australians."
- In 1997, Katter advocated changing the Child Support Scheme to lessen the financial maintenance obligations for non-custodial parents. He claimed there was an "anti-male bias" in the scheme, and that "in 90 per cent of cases the bloke has done nothing wrong [and] the woman was at fault".


And my favorite...

- Katter was accused in 2001 of signing a petition promoted by the Citizens Electoral Council (CEC), an organisation that claims the Port Arthur massacre was a conspiracy.
Oh no, he loves the conspiratorial claims too?  He's just as nuts as our people are, you just have a shorter leash.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •