Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

Op-ed: The Importance of Marriage Equality to Trans Community

Started by Shana A, April 10, 2012, 05:27:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Posted on Advocate.com April 10, 2012 04:00:00 AM ET

Op-ed: The Importance of Marriage Equality to Trans Community
Some transgender people are frustrated by the significant resources that our organizations devote to marriage equality efforts, but there's reason to believe it will make a difference.
By Matt Wood, op-ed contributor

http://www.advocate.com/Politics/Commentary/Oped_The_Importance_of_Marriage_Equality_to_Trans_Community/

While this frustration is understandable, it may be short-sighted. First, it ignores the fact that many transgender people are also lesbian, gay, or bisexual, or in relationships that the government views as legally "same-sex," even if the partners consider themselves to be different sex.

For instance, a marriage between a trans man and a non-trans woman might or might not be legally recognized as a valid different-sex marriage. That's because the standard for having a person's gender identity legally recognized depends upon where they were born, and where they currently live. While most states permit a person to change the gender on their birth certificate, many require the person to have some kind of medical intervention in order to do so — medical intervention that many transgender people may not be able to afford, or may not want. Some states, including Idaho, Tennessee, and Ohio, refuse to change the gender marker on birth certificates.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

Stephe

IMHO this -same sex marriage- issue is THE reason why having a sex marker change is such a big deal in many places. If same sex couples could marry everywhere, I highly doubt most of the states who block sex marker change would have any reason to continue to do so. It also would user in "You can't refuse to allow sex marker change" at the federal level as well. I'm sure why many states that do -allow sex marker changes only after surgery- is so "Some guy can't come in and claim he is a woman so he can marry another man"... If that was legal, this reasoning would no longer exist.
  •