Quote from: Elaine on May 09, 2007, 09:31:12 PM
Cindi -- I'm hoping that if my carrier doesn't have it I could scare them with a lawyer and have a similar result. That's amazing for 19 years ago!
Amy -- Grrrrahhhaaah! [insert continued unsettled sounds] I was expecting something like that. I really have my heart set on Montreal! Will try not be disappointed until I find out for certain. Will figure something out (even if it involves me taking out a personal loan to get the surgeon I want
). Besides, Brassard is actually the closest to me.
Melissa -- But you're going overseas so it's not an optimistic situation anyway (as per Amy's post). So happy for you by the way!
I might not post a lot here at Susan's, but I do read a lot. We've both had similarly matching timelines on this journey, and I remember where we both were 2 or 3 years ago (or maybe more or less). Anyway, you have my well wishes.
There is somewhat of a possibility that they would cover a procedure in Canada, but any procedure in Thailand is out of the question. Brassard is a US licensed doctor, so there is more of a possibility that you may argue for coverage. It is still worth checking out if you have the exclusion or not in the policy, or the transgender rider was present. Even if there is the exclusion, you can fight it if you live in one of the states with a transgender non-discrimination law or one of the states with good court precedent. You may still get them to cover at least part of the costs as long as you do stay stateside.
Sorry Melissa, if I knew you had Aetna, I would have advised for you to check into your policy. You could have actually saved money by staying stateside if the exclusion was not there. No matter what you are incurring the full cost.
I am a lawyer and there is an exclusion in my policy (I have BCBS), and I will be fighting the exclusion since DC has an expansive non-discrimination law, and since the exclusion is no longer a standard practice with regards to health insurance policies, so I do have grounds to fight the exclusion. The sad part about this, is I would love to go to Montreal myself, and may ultimately choose to do so. But if I get my insurance company to fold under legal threats it would be worthwhile to stay stateside and have this treated like any other medical problem. I will be fighting for pre-approval, so I would not have to worry about asking for money after things are done (where a denial of coverage is almost a guarantee).
Am I thinking about this too early (this process is about a year and a half away for me)...probably not. It will probably take me at least a year to craft this document where it is air tight. In addition I need time to put in place an advocacy campaign.