Continuing my experiment with resistant starch, I tried raw oatmeal. The idea is to take one part oatmeal and one part liquid (water, milk... I used mostly water and a little heavy cream) and let them soak for 12 hours. This obviously requires planning if you want it the next morning. I went ahead and put a little salt, a little KAL stevia, and a little cinnamon in it and stirred it up. It was great! It was like getting to eat cold cereal again.
At first, I tried quick oats. My understanding was these were just cut into smaller pieces but still raw. My BGL one hour later--156! I even retested carefully and got almost exactly the same number.
I just didn't think that could be right. This stuph was supposed to be loaded with resistant starch as long as it was raw. Even if not, there's a decent amount of fiber in oatmeal. I wouldn't expect it to spike me higher than anything else I've tested. I still wonder if that was a lark and I was determined to try again.
So this morning I did try again with straight-up old fashioned oats; not the quick kind. They were delicious. I left them in a jar in the frig overnight. This time my BGL was 86!
It's just a one-time experiment so I'm still a bit confused but I see no point in doing the quick oats anymore. I liked the regular oats just fine. Can't really tell a difference. When I was cooking them, the quick oats had a consistency I liked better but that's not really apparent prepared this way.
So anyway, if you're a diabetic who misses cold cereal in the morning, might be worth a try. Test yourself! We're all different. Again, resistant starch is supposed to be really good for you, and besides not raising your blood sugar, it may even help control your blood sugar later in the day. That's the theory anyway.