Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

The Silence of the Lambs... Is It Transphobic?

Started by Allie24, October 17, 2017, 05:40:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RobynD

Quote from: Allie24 on October 31, 2017, 03:12:48 PM
Devil's Advocate, here: do we have tangible evidence that making Buffalo Bill a crossdresser was indeed done for the sake of adding to his level of deviance (i.e. quotes from the producers, directorial notes, etc.)?

We don't have hard evidence no, unless the writer of the screenplay would chime in. None that I know of, that is true. Hollywood for many years has made it one of those things though, there are other examples. Thankfully the portrayal of LGTB+ people is getting better and better .


  •  

Kylo

How about Thomas Harris' writing? Because the script follows the book very closely. And in that there are two mentions in which the lack of correlation between transsexualism and violence is specifically brought up, that Bill is not a transsexual and is instead trying to escape the fact his mother found him disgusting as a boy and a child, abused him, etc. Even in the movie Lecter says he wasn't born a killer but made one over years of systematic abuse. And in the scene with Catherine screaming in the well, the making of docu mentions Bill imitates his mother mocking her, as she mocked him as a child, and it's strongly implied that the mother used to call her son "it". The psychological disturbance of the character follows on from this. Even others writing analysis on the character have picked up on it: "He does not understand gender as inherent, innate; he reads it only as a surface effect, a representation, an external attribute engineered into identity." (Halberstam). It's not a stretch to imagine a severely abused and dehumanized child could be taught to loathe and dehumanize themselves and others, which is exactly what Bill does. He treats his victims with the same cold detachment as his mother did him, and his making a suit out of real skins as just another in a long string of distractions this character pursued as result of his issues. He has no center of substance and is constantly trying to find one in himself - the medical profession identified that he wasn't really trans and rejected him several times, apparently recognizing his extreme psychological disturbance.

Harris made Bill a composite of various serial killers and killers but based the motive for Bill's actions not on the idea he was some mad deviant doing everything for kicks, but that he was abused and locked in a cycle of self-loathing and violence due to internal dehumanization he had developed. That this is explicitly stated in the book and film ought to answer the question of if there was some intent to implicate trans people. If there were, why would he bother to point out trans people are usually not violent psychopaths, that even the medical profession didn't qualify him as transsexual after psych evaluation.
"If the freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
  •