Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Schroer v. Billington: What Does It Mean For Transgender Employees?

Started by Shana A, September 21, 2008, 04:39:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Schroer v. Billington: What Does It Mean For Transgender Employees?
Filed by: Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
September 21, 2008 4:30 PM

http://www.bilerico.com/2008/09/schroer_v_billington_what_does_it_mean_f.php

There was a wonderful post by Nan Hunter earlier on this court opinion from the United States Federal District Court for the District of Columbia. I'd like to raise the question of what this opinion means for transgender employees.

The Schroer opinion answers a number of interesting questions.

1. What types of reasons for discrimination constitute a "pretext" -- a cover-up -- when it comes to employer reasons for gender identity discrimination?
2. What types of reasons for gender identity discrimination are legitimate and which are illegitimate?
3. How do sex stereotypes become sex discrimination when applied to a transgender employee?
4. How does "sex" discrimination include gender identity discrimination?

It's also interesting to see how Judge Robertson's understanding of transgender people changed after hearing the trial testimony.
Shop TLA Video
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •