Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

The Ultimate Judges of Real Womanhood

Started by Butterfly, May 04, 2010, 05:11:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Butterfly

The Ultimate Judges of Real Womanhood
TS-SI
By Lisa Jain Thompson     
25 April, 2010


http://ts-si.org/global-warning/24720-the-ultimate-judges-of-real-womanhood


As has been said many times in many places, the male portion of the population believe they are the ultimate arbitrators of all things female. Men are the ones who determine who is too heavy or too tall, whose breasts are too small or hips are too large, whose bones who are too big, whose body language does not willingly submit to the everpresent male gaze.

They set themselves up as the Supreme Court for establishing the constitutional bounds of real womanhood. Venture outside these boundaries and a woman will find herself subject to the catcalls and derision of men determined to maintain their supposed domination over women everywhere.
  •  

Miniar

That post is the biggest pile of sexist drivel I've read so far in 2010.



"Everyone who has ever built anywhere a new heaven first found the power thereto in his own hell" - Nietzsche
  •  

Kaelin

I don't know if it's the worst I've seen this year, but it's a worthless failure nonetheless.  Very few people fit stereotypes, and very fewer people (men or women) get to call the shots.
  •  

Miniar

The sad part is...

I think it's "serious".



"Everyone who has ever built anywhere a new heaven first found the power thereto in his own hell" - Nietzsche
  •  

Jasmine.m

Maybe I read this wrong, but I thought the author was writing a sarcastic article in response to the bigoted comment she got from Name Withheld? Did I misread it?
  •  

Kaelin

I don't know.  I can't really stand reading most of it.  Even if that's what it is, sarcasm doesn't translate well over the Internet.

Or to quote Randall of xkcd: "Fun game: try to post a YouTube comment so stupid that people realize you must be joking. (Hint: this is impossible)"
  •