Quote from: Ann Onymous on September 20, 2011, 09:27:02 AM
The CURE for transsexualism IS the surgery. Everything else is ancillary. And in that respect, I simply cannot fathom WHY someone would NOT want the cure for the medical condition...to live in an incomplete state is tantamount to not living at all.
I kneejerk-reacted to these statements yesterday, and posted a not-very-helpful response as a consequence. I've had more time since to ponder over why the above made me uncomfortable, and so I'm going to have a better go at explaining my response.
For me, the above statements could only hold true for someone who considers their gender dysphoria to be an illness/condition - because if you don't have an illness/condition, the concept of "cure" is redundant. And for me, I don't experience my dysphoria as an illness or condition - I experience it as an emotional and somatic response to a disability.
How it feels to me is that I'm female, but I was born with a physical disability that has forced me to spend my life "passing" as male. My desire for HRT and SRS is an expression of my desire to have corrective/cosmetic treatment for this disability, in order that I can live more normally. Like the muscles I was born missing, there's no "cure" for my missing genuine, functional female anatomy (or for my lack of a lifetime of socialisation as female); the current state of the art in medicine only allows for me to have my body tweaked so that it resembles my female body enough for me to be happy with it, and to live as I feel I'm supposed to live. That will have to do - and that
will do, that will be enough for me.
I'm in no way writing this with an expectation that anyone else does or should feel the same way I do - and that's the point. If just I and the next person along who wants (or has had) SRS can want apparently the same thing, for such very diverse reasons on the basis of such different experiences of ourselves, then it's obvious to me that transitioning people in general want SRS (or don't want it) for an unimaginably vast array of different reasons.
My knee-jerk reaction to what you wrote was a knock-on effect of feeling lately that some people on Susan's, sometimes (on "both sides" of the argument for SRS being The Touchstone), are saying just this: "if you don't feel exactly the same as me about this, then you're clearly just either deluded or damaged." I'm no longer assuming that's what you were saying here, so I'm not reacting to you any more

, but I wanted to explain where I'm at with this. I've said this before: we can't second-guess other people's motives (and I shouldn't have done so with yours).