Regarding what Nina said, I suddenly came to wonder how it comes that there truly are no "out" ->-bleeped-<-lovers?
I mean, there are proud and out gays, proud and out bisexuals, proud and out transgenders, ->-bleeped-<-s, transsexuals and a row of other varianted people, but no out and proud ->-bleeped-<-lovers.
This is something I have actually often found very hard to digest about them, as so many of them views transpeople as a "dirty secret".
But what is so bad about liking ->-bleeped-<-s,
exactly? I mean, they are really just a combination of males and females or some other version of those, so what is so shameful about it?
I mean, you cannot say that; "Oh but it's so against the norm" or; "It's because it is so controversial", because it is not, and especially not in these days.
So why is it, exactly?